Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178872657 | Nice addition. I added sidewalks and addresses using the counties parcel data. I suspect there is a crossing at the start of 34th street but can you confirm? |
|
| 178844101 | It was the DAV Construction LLC node. |
|
| 178834607 | Thanks for asking. When you save and upload an edit follow the guidance at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Basically, just leave a brief description of what you did. |
|
| 178841676 | Instead of deleting the building, just change the tags to the correct tags. In this case building=roof + layer=1. I went ahead and added it back.
|
|
| 178839305 | It looks like you added the same device twice. Can you review this edit to make sure the devices are accurate.
|
|
| 178834607 | Please add a changeset comment when uploading. This may help you and others in the future.
|
|
| 178844101 | The bot made the node look like a regular business, but it just looks like a private house. I doubt they would want people showing up 24 hours a day, but that is what may happen. I would have deleted this node. |
|
| 178792034 | Why did you add access=private? It should be posted as no trespassing. If it is privately maintain then ownership=private would be more approriate.
|
|
| 178772182 | This device seems to be no where near a road. Can you confirm it is in the correction location?
|
|
| 178699871 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. You could also add the name of the business + any other info like website and phone number along with a tag to describe the type of business. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. There you can find links to our wiki to help you.
|
|
| 178642700 | #TIP: We don't use descriptive names, instead just make sure the tags are correct. Looks like someone removed the name tags.
|
|
| 178609947 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 178601374 | We don't use descriptive names unless they are posted on the field. Can you verify that there are signs with the fields name? Also, please use a brief descriptive changeset comment. Like "Added farms and a pond.
|
|
| 178552516 | It helps to add crossing=unmarked to warn drivers of the type of crossing.
|
|
| 177974120 | Yes, they do count. Unfortunately, the imagery hasn't caught up yet. |
|
| 177974120 | I noticed the added exit way from Hwy 20 to North Skagit Street. We typically don't add a turn way unless there is a physical barrier. I just just there this week and I don't recall a barrier but I know they did construction at this intersection. also if there is a barrier, it should be tagged as a primary link. |
|
| 178239584 | From all of the gates and barriers, and from talking to a former skagit county manager I don't think so, but I've email the only employee with the county to hopefully get a definative answer. |
|
| 178383795 | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM, the tags do all the work. I went ahead and removed the name tag.
|
|
| 155630191 | I know this was a couple of years back, but do you know why you added bicycle=permissive to a couple of short ways infront of the train/bus station bldg? I'm trying to create a bike map and they don't connect to anything. |
|
| 178276608 | #TIP: don't add a node to an existing way. Look for the pole's shadow and just use a single node for the ALPR device. Other than that it looks great.
|