Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. 576 feet would be really high, but considering that this is in meters, that would be really high!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170415161

The incline tag is typically looking for either a specific value, like 8% or incline=up/down. However, adding incline to a trail would require spliting the way everytime it goes up or down. See incline=* for more detail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170255592

On this and the previous edit you added a descriptive name to the service road. Unfortunately we don't use descriptive names. Only add names to features that are signed. Can you review these edits to make sure the names are appropriate? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. Let me know if you need any help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170177344

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170170318

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170169900

If the stop is gone, you can just delete the node. If it has moved, free free to move it, and of course update the name. Let me know if you have any questions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170081557

#TIP: OSM started in England so we use Englands road classifications, including for sidewalks and paths. A footway is more like what we could call a sidewalk while a path is more like what we call a trail. Could you review this edit and confirm that Terrace Trail is a foodway?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170081292

#TIP: Just add the address to the building. A separate address node is redundant.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170044969

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170042456

You added a building within a building. While OSM does have the ability to map indoor features it is only used by a few very advanced mappers. I would suggest just adding a node to the feature.

Can you please remove the building tag on the half baked and lil fruity restaurant?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170037236

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

These nodes don't make any sense.

Also, please leave a changeset comment
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170020416

You didn't tag the way and it doesn't match imagery. Reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170019997

#TIP: instead of deleting and re-adding the feature, just move the feature and update tags as needed which save the history of the object.

Question, is SE 12th Street have no trespassing signs or is it just privately owned? If privately owned then use ownership=private. Also, King County iMap appears shows this a owned by the city of North Bend
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169962677

I have reverted the border change. Thanks for getting back to me.

I went ahead and added sport-multi. The area looks like a half court basketball, but I'm not sure about the other markings. If you find out, the correct tagging would be something like sport=basketball;tennis;etc. Just add the games separated by a semicolon.

#TIP: use the tag ownership=private instead of access=private unless the road is marked as no trespassing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169841695

What kind of sport or sports are played on here? Can you add them?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169839110

#TIP: Instead of deleting and then adding the feature back, just adjust the geometry and tags to save the history of a feature
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169835919

DWG here. I was about to revert the previous changeset that moved the border. While I know of the conflict, I'm not knowledgeable of the details. Is this an actual disputed area or should it be reverted back to the previous state?