It looks like you deleted some features that were tagged as abandoned. Those are allowed in OSM but shouldn't show up on trail maps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503491

I'm guessing there is a roof over the gas pumps. It's best to tag the polygon as building=roof + level=1. Adding the level tag allows service road to go under the roof without causing a validation error.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503763

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503109

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502095

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502299

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502253

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It looks like you moved an address from the correct location. See https://gisweb.jeffcowa.us/LandRecords/ for address data. Can you fix this? Let me know if you need assistance.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502010

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501781

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501066

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163497081

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163497013

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163496976

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163496953

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good with the exception of descriptive names. We do not use descriptive names in OSM. Instead, find a tag that best describes the feature. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163466820

There is no road across 101. Reverting
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422261

Also a trunk. Reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422488

Same again. It's not even a divided highway. reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422475

This is also a trunk. Reverting.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422444

The local community has agreed that this is a trunk. I'm going to revert.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422417

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion. Try not to connect the trail to the park landuse. If either change, it requires disconnecting nodes.

Also, Is this a trail or more like a gravel sidewalk? OSM, which started in England, uses British English terms. So a path lis like a trail and a footway is more like a sidewalk. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163378278