Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162337113 | I typically only use the disued when the business location is unoccupied. With the new business, I'd recommend just removing all of the old starbucks tags. The history of the node will still show that starbucks once occupied the place. |
|
| 162337113 | #TIP: Don't forget to remove the other starbucks tags, like brand and brand:wikidata
|
|
| 162327697 | #TIP: In OSM we spell out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix addr:street?
|
|
| 162303615 | Another restaurant is shown operating out of the entire building. Did Saigon Drip replace the other restaurant? Can you review this edit?
|
|
| 162268799 | I don't believe the Burke-Gilman trail is the right street. Can you recheck the address?
|
|
| 162265495 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 162265402 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 162262144 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 162267146 | How did you ever find this building?
|
|
| 162251455 | OSMCha doesn't seem to be able to handle this large edit. Can you give more detail as to what was done?
|
|
| 162074654 | Looking at King County IMAP, there doesn't appear to be an address. See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/ |
|
| 162185970 | I mentioned unclassified because Lake Trask Road was changed from unclassified to residential. By looking at the imagery, Lake Trask Road looks like an unclassified to me.
|
|
| 162194140 | We spell out street name in OSM, the reason is that software has a hard time unabbrevating. I went ahead and fixed them
|
|
| 162190830 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Please don't vandalize OSM. Both of your edits have been reverted.
|
|
| 162190750 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Please don't vandalize OSM
|
|
| 162185970 | FYI - an unclassified road is basically just a rural residential road. We do this because OSM was started in England so we use their road classification system. I mention this because you changed an unclassified road to residential. I notice you removed a footway near West Railroad Avenue. Is there a reason you removed it?
|
|
| 162139990 | The path was tagged as access=private. Because of that I reverted your edit but did add a tag ownership=private. If you disagree, please explain why. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 162138990 | One website shows the site as active. See https://www.airnav.com/airport/WA75. Not sure how accurate the site is.
|
|
| 162074654 | Thanks for fixing the house numbers. Please note that there is already a park. The address node is for the park. I'd suggest adding it back to the park boundary. Let me know if you need help.
|
|
| 162062476 | I fixed the relationship and also removed the name from the guest house. We don't add names unless it is signed. Feel free to add it back if there is a sign. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|