According to plugshares terms, sharing of their data is not allowed. See "Use of the Service. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, you are hereby granted a non-exclusive, limited, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, freely revocable license to use the Service for your personal, noncommercial use only and as permitted by the features of the Service. Company reserves all rights not expressly granted herein in the Service and the Company Content (as defined below). Company may terminate this license at any time for any reason or no reason." Can you verify that you are aware of this ev charging station and it's capabilities? If not then this node should be removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159352747

According to plugshares terms, sharing of their data is not allowed. See "Use of the Service. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, you are hereby granted a non-exclusive, limited, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, freely revocable license to use the Service for your personal, noncommercial use only and as permitted by the features of the Service. Company reserves all rights not expressly granted herein in the Service and the Company Content (as defined below). Company may terminate this license at any time for any reason or no reason." Can you verify that you are aware of this ev charging station and it's capabilities? If not then this node should be removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159352747

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159352429

Thanks for the info and look forward to seeing the completed project mapped in OSM

I don't know if it was wrong, I was just surprised at the size of the changeset bbox.

Why did you include a service street in Oregon with this change in Germany?

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

again it looks like to added a feature inside of another. In this case a building inside of an existing building. Please correct.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230421

#TIP: please square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q".

The top building you have as layer -1, which means it's below ground. I think you meant layer=1 then you would also want to change it to building=roof. These are often found in covered gas pump locations.

The bottom building layer=1 is unnecessary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230404

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You duplicated the already mapped Hickman Park. Pleaase fix.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230357

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It looks like you duplicated the cemetery. Can you fix this?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230309

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159230296

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159225685

#TIP: try to match the roof outline better. Then use the square tool by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159225104

You added a large building near the Mukilteo Ferry Terminal but the imagery doesn't so it. Can you confirm it's there?

You also accidentally dragged a node of a parking aisle road. I fixed that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159193991

#TIP: The road you added looks like a driveway instead of an unclassified road. An unclassified road is like a residential street in a rural area. Driveways are tag as highway=service + service=driveway. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159187677

Instead of removing the trail a better option is to add the access=private tag to help prevent unauthorized access to the trail. By removing the trail someone can easily add it back. Can you review this changeset?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159187829

Thanks

Thanks for fixing it. I added an address to the new bldg. (I'm one that wants bldgs to have addresses.) Also noticed the coffee shop you added. They talk about the Costa Rica experience. I love Costa Rica. We've been so many time and have friends that live there.

Why did you delete everything you just added?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159168955

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

We do not use descriptive names, such as name=Building, that is what the building=yes tag is for. Also, it looks like you duplicated the post office node, accidentally dragged two street ways.

Because of all the problems I've decided to just revert the entire edit. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. Let me know if you disagree with my actions.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159158083