OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
150425929

Thanks for the clarification. I couldn't see it on the latest imagery.

150425354

Instead of removing objects then adding them back - it's better to update the existing geometry - which save the history of the object.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150425354

150425929

I'm not sure what you mean by cycleway=track. Check out cycleway=* for adding bike lanes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150425929

150422413

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150422413

150416470

Please use a descriptive changeset comment like you have done in your other edits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150416470

150394812

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150394812

150380068

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150380068

150372053

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150372053

150312640

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150312640

150284719

I have reverted all of your additions of the golf course. OSM is only for verifiable features.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150284719

150284719

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150284719

150248123

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150248123

150235514

Reverted - added business to highway when it should have been a node inside of a building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150235514

150106897

a driveway should just be a way not an area. I see someone remove it already.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150106897

150106952

highway=service is needed with service=parking_aisle. I added them back.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150106952

150476965

I think your first edit was better. The wiki recommends seamark:type=wreck. See osm.wiki/Seamarks/Wrecks

Please review this edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150476965

150016695

#TIP: instead of removing the node, just delete all but the address info which can be used when another business moves in.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150016695

149929182

Interesting. Is it restricted to only PNNL vehicles? Private could mean that it's privately owned but not restricted. In which case the appropriate tag could be ownership=private. or more specifically ownership=DOE
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149929182

149929182

Why is this a private road? It looks like it belongs to the county.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149929182

149805134

If multiple facilities are in a building, just use a node for each feature inside the building. Let me know if you have any questions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149805134