Thanks for the edit. I've also removed the highway=track tag from the bridge just to make sure, in case a router ignores the access=no.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. There's a note here referring to a business, is that the same one you've just added?
note/2904925

The cycleway connects to a footway in OSM which will likely prevent routing between the two roads - how does it connect to the road on the ground?

As you can see on Bing there is construction work in the area, and Streetside here is from 2012 or 2020 so your sources are out of date.
If you are unsure in the future please leave an OSM note at the location asking for local mappers to confirm whether the imagery is correct or not.
I've reverted this changeset to remove the roundabout.

This is a mini roundabout as the island is traversable.

Seriously? You are aware that Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta is the "old" Bing imagery from 10 years ago, right?

Why have you added this road, when clearly it runs through the back gardens of some houses? way/1149797340

Sorry this should be the correct Bing link: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=56.058596%7E-3.415517&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&style=x&dir=176.5&pi=0

Unless these signs have been removed it would seem to be shared use (would be pretty strange for it to be marked as a NCN route whilst only being a footway)
https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=d193ccef-884d-4771-bc82-4c379681f515&cp=56.056031~-3.414989&lvl=17&pi=0&style=x&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

Thanks for the shop updates but just a note on your edits - shop=vacant would be better as "yes" implies there's an (uncategorised) occupied shop here; and there's not really a need to add a fixme :)
If something does need surveyed then it's probably better adding an OSM note which is more likely to be noticed by people out surveying.
note/new

What's the reason for the revert?

Hi, thanks for adding the house numbers etc here. Just a note on your edits and some things I've fixed.
If you've added a addr:housename or housenumber tag then you don't need to also duplicate that in the name tag.
The default Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment so before adding things, you should go into the background layers, scroll down to "overlays" and then turn on the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" layer. Then you can use the imagery offset tool further down to move the Bing imagery slightly to match the blue lines - it was about -3.0,-1.0 for me.
Cheers :)

If the cycle path is closed off and under construction it should really be tagged as highway=construction

Thanks :) @Mark - by "just" I meant it doesn't qualify as a highway=pedestrian, which is normally used for the likes of pedestrianised High Streets or other wider roads with very restricted access, rather than this path which is narrower and has bollards.

Hmm, not sure that is allowed as the site plan is a copyrighted map...

Well actually looking at it, seems like people are walking on the path and Strava's heatmap shows lots of activity - so it's probably back open since the edit 7 years ago!

You've tagged this the wrong way about, should be highway=construction + construction=footway

You've added construction=yes to this path - way/45362090/history - if it is indeed under construction it should be tagged highway=construction+construction=footway so renderers and routers don't think it is open. Same for other paths in Sighthill Park.

What is the source for this? (given it is not on any imagery)

Thanks for the edit however this is just a (cycle) path.