I thought from the (many!) emails that I read on talk-gb, we weren't using post towns given these are for Royal Mail and not OSM? Cowie is a village so it doesn't make sense to tag it as a suburb of its post town. So I've retagged all of these to move the suburb to the city.

Thanks but I was referring to the separate value, which can be used to indicate there is a sidewalk mapped separately as described here: sidewalk=*

Hi, what does your comment mean "for modelling"?

You might want to use sidewalk=separate on these roads instead :)

Why change it to suburb when it's not one? Surely changing the city to would be better?

Not sure there's really a need to remove shop=vacant here...

Better to add access tags here, if it's impassable for all modes then access=private or =no

Hi, I've removed the name from these paths as they are already part of the SUW relation.
Also, please can you use a more descriptive changeset comment than just "edit"? :)

Thanks, I've tagged it as tourism=chalet

Hi, welcome to OSM. Just wondering what it is you were looking to add here - is this separate to the rest of the holiday park?

Probably better to use the amenity=social_facility tag instead?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. If you know whether there is a pavement on one or both sides, it might be worth tagging the road with sidewalk=left/right/both - see sidewalk=*

Hi, thanks for adding buildings and addresses. However, just to make you aware that the Bing imagery is out of alignment. If you turn on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer then you can use that to help you fix the Bing offset, which seems to be about 4,-1.5 in this area. :)

It would've been the latter - it only had the brand wikidata and not the wikipedia so iD offered to add it.

Which apps suggest this is a cycleway?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
This is tagged as a footway+sidewalk so it implies bicycle=no - the tag would only be added if there was a no cycling sign, which I don't think there is?
Especially as Princes Street is a core path.

In case you haven't noticed - Bing imagery is usually slightly out of alignment in the UK, so you need to fix the offset and align it to the existing OSM data or the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels before editing.

Hi, I'm assuming that node/9303695226 is just the instore bakery and not a separate shop?

Thanks for updating the map. There's a couple of notes in the area to be resolve if you are able to survey them:
note/2647663
note/2566640

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. You've marked the whole of Seggie Drive as open - is that correct or is the bit in the middle still under construction?