Which apps suggest this is a cycleway?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
This is tagged as a footway+sidewalk so it implies bicycle=no - the tag would only be added if there was a no cycling sign, which I don't think there is?
Especially as Princes Street is a core path.

In case you haven't noticed - Bing imagery is usually slightly out of alignment in the UK, so you need to fix the offset and align it to the existing OSM data or the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels before editing.

Hi, I'm assuming that node/9303695226 is just the instore bakery and not a separate shop?

Thanks for updating the map. There's a couple of notes in the area to be resolve if you are able to survey them:
note/2647663
note/2566640

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. You've marked the whole of Seggie Drive as open - is that correct or is the bit in the middle still under construction?

Is this actually a school? way/975642304

Indeed, a comment like "added historic railway station" would be better here :)

I think sport was a typo and it was meant to be source= instead...

yeah it was, thanks for noticing

Just wondering, what was the reason for adding oneway:bicycle=no here? way/7982333/history

Zoom in and adjust the offset so the blue lines match up with the garden boundaries etc.
In this area it seems the offset is about 1.5,-3.5

You can turn it on in the background settings > overlays and then adjust the offset for Bing.

Hi, not sure if you are aware but Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment here. If you turn on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay it will help you to fix the offset.

Great, have updated those (assume the tunnel is no longer dirt surface).
If you know the lit=yes/no status worth adding that as well.

Hi, thanks for the edits. I've removed access=no and bicycle=yes from the Electric Bridge as these are unnecessary for a cycleway way/24800324
You also updated The Drift path surface - do the improvements continue under the railway onto the path to Wallyford station?

Hi,
Unfortunately I am not local to this area so I cannot get any photos.
I made the edit based on this tweet from someone who is local: https://twitter.com/SkyeforAll/status/1469666901165056003
On their website they have a page with details of the road http://skyeforall.co.uk/the-old-moll-road/ including a photo of the landslip - http://skyeforall.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/20210820_144338.jpg - you can decide whether it is passable with a bike or not!
Perhaps you could send them a tweet or contact them on their website if you need more information?

So it's now two way for all vehicles? Because the previous tagging meant it was only two way for bikes+buses.

Probably better to add individual nodes with highway=crossing+crossing=* rather than add crossing=* to the traffic lights, that way you can position them accurately and add details.

What's the reason for removing the cycleway=opposite_lane from way/463491072/history?