No worries, thanks for fixing it :)

Yes. I can see from Mapillary images that it's a bit wider than I thought, but there are no blue signs to say it is a shared use path (and it's not a core path either): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/jWUf4uVGP7KCFarTD7PCIA
So unless something has changed recently, then it should just be tagged as highway=footway + footway=sidewalk + surface

This looks like a mini-roundabout to me, going by this photo from last year: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/y7eLYZ2giHIlgJcKZFFuZw - unless things have changed and the middle is no longer traversable?

Here's the definition on the wiki: highway=mini%20roundabout

Thanks, I know about new Bing and offsets - I used one to align things with old Bing (Esri clarity) and OSSV.

There's a note here about the old Lidl to the southeast - presumably that is closed? note/2366447

Hi, do you have any more information about this place?

Isn't this just a narrow pavement?

I've changed this to leisure=bowling_alley node/7692590195

Is there actually a bar here or is this just someone's house?

Might be better just setting this as access=no incase data consumers don't read the temporary:access tag?

Did you manage to survey way/246294072/history as I'm wondering if it's actually access=no?

Hi, just be careful as you managed to disconnect the paths in this area when you edited the forest :) osm.org/#map=19/56.02169/-4.74207

Is this still a shop or is it vacant? node/4161720029

Thanks, I sent them a message as well a few days ago but no reply.

Did you mean to remove the brand:wikipedia?

Thanks for the reply - probably won't have much affect here, but in future have a quick check of the other background imagery layers (e.g. Esri, Maxar) to see if Bing is out of date. Especially if you're not local or haven't surveyed the area :)

Hi, I assume the steps are connected to Rose Dene Drive? What about this section with a gap here? node/7304773989#map=19/55.92907/-4.31430&layers=N

Have all these parking aisle reopened as there's some construction ongoing in the area?

Just be aware that the updated Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment in a lot of areas with the old Bing (now found at Esri clarity).
So you should check the alignment of roads and features with the imagery, and then adjust the offset if necessary.

Just be careful when using Bing imagery - although it's newer and more detailed, it seems to be slightly out of alignment with the old Bing imagery (now visible at Esri clarity).