GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 73926346 | Thanks for adding this, however if it is a road under construction it should be tagged as highway=construction.
|
|
| 73912651 | Please write a more useful changeset comment when make your edits - something like "improved road geometry, add guest house" would be better for other people looking at the history. |
|
| 73872505 | Thanks for the reply. Can I suggest that in future you create a note so that local mappers might notice it and then survey the new roads? For example: note/1905182 |
|
| 73872505 | Hi, do you know the street names of these new residential roads? |
|
| 73850508 | You'll need to fix this as the coastline should match the MWHS - ie the blue line on OS_OpenData_StreetView - and not the beach here. |
|
| 73723410 | Hi, can I ask why this is a non-viable route? |
|
| 73702050 | What's the reason for removing the ref from this road? way/26763787 |
|
| 73693104 | Sure, but from reading the wiki it should be secondary as the B981 passes through the roundabout: junction=roundabout?uselang=en-GB#Selection_of_the_right_highway_tag |
|
| 73693104 | Why have you changed the gyratory to primary? |
|
| 72057362 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. However I've had to remove this residential area as there's clearly not houses here. Can you explain what you trying to do by adding it? |
|
| 73573640 | Thanks for the edit however the name shouldn't be added as it's already in the route relation. |
|
| 72689354 | This edit has been reverted |
|
| 73389238 | It's the first edit of a Maps.me user, I doubt they have any idea of what a changeset and what you're talking about. |
|
| 73247472 | Well as it's not currently in use but the rails are still in place it meets the OSM definition of disused. It's not under construction either with detailed designs being drawn up. |
|
| 73222998 | Well no, if it's not actually an active construction site then use something else like proposed=*. But railway=disused is fine for now because the rails are still in place - don't worry, there will lots of publicity when works actually begin! |
|
| 73222998 | I've reverted this changeset. The line is not currently under construction and is not named the Leven Regeneration Line (no idea where you got that from - did you just make it up?) |
|
| 73241413 | Where did you get this name from? |
|
| 73126466 | Hi, just be careful with the new Maxar imagery, as it usually seems to slightly be out of alignment with Bing. I've tidied up the rest of roads here. |
|
| 69290712 | I've reverted this as the edits to the lifeboat station and pier are clearly incorrect. |
|
| 72912686 | Sorry, not sure how to partially revert changes, but thanks for sorting them. |