Hi, just wondering why you added the railway=station tag to way/129707311?

Hi, welcome to OSM. I noticed you added a duplicate street with a new name - I've fixed it by splitting the old street in two and adding the new name.

Please try and avoid connecting landuse to roads like you've done with way/653478229 - it's a pain in the arse if things change in the future and you need to separate them! :)

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Just wondering if you know the names of these two places?

You should really have moved the "catholic" value to the denomination tag instead of removing it.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.
Just wondering why you've change the website for the market, when the new one doesn't work?
Also is the Hawico store definitely closed?

If someone is using the OSM website to look up their doctor's number then having it in the correct international format will create a "tel:" link and allow them to call the number directly without copying and pasting.

Ok, sounds like the parts where cars can drive along should be marked as a service road, with motor_vehicle=private. I've done that for the bit from the A719 to the driveway at the two buildings - let me know if that's ok.

As for the path parallel to Greenan Road - based on what you've said I've changed it to foot=no.

There's also the issue of a number of paths being tagged with access=no - this isn't really necessary and may confuse routers (plus it renders differently). If it's a cycleway or path, that already prevents motor_vehicle access.

And there are a number of points tagged as bollards which are separate to the paths, e.g. osm.org/edit?node=5881296024 - these need to be moved so they are part of the way (and access tags added).

Hi, I've removed the amenity=school that you added here as it's not an active school.

Hi, this section of path - way/23362827 - has motor_vehicle=permissive. Just want to check - is this an actual cycle path (i.e. no access to vehicles) or is it a track/service road instead?

Is way/321326605 an active church?
Also you probably should "square" some of the buildings you added, eg way/650620890

Couldn't help but add the surface to this path after I notice the mapillary images :) Saw some 20mph signs as well.

Is this actually a roundabout, as it's still a junction on imagery from May 2017 way/567076672

Don't think we need to tag the two low level platforms as a separate station.

I have reverted this changeset as trains still stop here until 9 December.

Presumably this is meant to be tagged as a highway of some kind? way/626844277
And surely the ways on either side are paths rather than tracks, given the steps?

Ok, thanks. I added these as under construction based on twitter images I saw on @SCWFriends, so I've set them as open now. If you know exactly where they end feel free to update. Be good to also have the speed limit on this and surrounding roads :)

Have you managed to survey this and if so, are these cycle tracks fully open?

Hi, noticed you added a road - way/643551290 - however it was only connected to the cycle path. I've fixed it and connected it to the roundabout instead.

Not really much point in adding a duplicate residential area when the town is already covered by one...