Hi, is this living street actually signed as a such, ie a home zone?
way/1309062369

Hi, the buildings with two housenumbers should either be split or two separate nodes added for each number (as 1/2 is not the actual address) and also addr:housename should be used instead for those with names. :)

hopefully you've reported them to the council or Sustrans etc :)

Hi, thanks for your recent edits and notes fixing. Not sure if you are aware, but there is an OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer which can be turned on to help you align background layers to the blue lines - in this area the offset is small but in other places Bing needs to be adjusted so map data isn't out of alignment. :)

what is your source for these names?

you've added three shop=car areas which are duplicating the individual buildings, think one or the other should be removed?

Is way/1159981713 definitely one way, as you surely must be able to exit from the cycle path there?

I'm assuming you didn't meant to change this to a one way path? way/359808819/history

Is there a reason why you removed the tags from the building and added a node instead? way/1075423806/history

Does this phone box actually exist and can it be used to make calls?

Hi, are these roads you've tagged as living streets signed as "home zones" on the ground?

Hi, this was a while ago, you can see what I changed here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107452137
Didn't really change the wood much, assuming it was already mapped either from aerial imagery or OS street view?
I have just updated the south part of the wood to account for the removal of trees though.

Hi, thanks but I've had to remove this node you added as it is a duplicate of the whole school area mapped here way/23136698

Yep that looks fine, thanks for sorting :)

Hi, landuse=allotments is for the entire allotment area - if you are mapping individual plots you should use allotments=plot allotments=plot

Is this actually Halfords or is this KwikFit with Halfords next door? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=414880187536695&focus=photo

Thanks for adding this, presumably the cycle path off to the side is two way rather than the one way which is currently mapped?

I think access=customers would be better for the access here? way/1213263474
Same with the other visitors values you've added in the UK as customers is used 1000x more...

The highway crossing tags were left on so streetcomplete would probably ask again, since there's a sidewalk mapped I've disconnected the steps from the road.

I've reverted this and changed it to landuse=brownfield