Hi, guessing there must've been a reason for why I mapped in the first place. Esri (clarity) shows it clearer and it seems to continue on further, maybe there was some Strava heatmap previously, or I saw photos/video of something in the area (can't remember!).

Suppose the good thing is that it doesn't connect to any other paths so not much chance of it being wrongly used by people. Perhaps additional tags better than deleting but up to you.

Assume Tolbooth Wynd is now two way?

In case you were wondering, I did that at the Bevy as basically the path is wide and also used by vehicles servicing the park etc, assume the same applies for these ones in the Glen?

Assume this is meant to be residential? Strange that StreetComplete made it just a road...

Well making the names all the same shouldn't be an issue... I see some are office=tax_advisor but they are surely all providing the same service, and as the wiki says that value is more specific than accountant which seems to cover everything they do (i.e. not just tax).

Maybe worth making all the name consistent as well? :)

Not sure why you added leisure=track - this tagging is not for motorsports, therefore I've removed it.

Hi, welcome to OSM. These two roads were already marked as oneway:psv=no to indicate they are two way for buses. Are they also two way for cars?

Just wondering why you removed the landuse=military from here?

Mind and use a different changeset comment for next time ;)

I've changed these to railway=construction btw

Thanks for the edit however if you want to change the speed limit for a road you need to actually edit the maxspeed tag on the road and not just add a sign.
Do you mean that the speed limit to the east of this sign is now 50mph? node/11190878399

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just wondering whether this should be access=yes (or no access tag at all) as I'm assuming you don't actually need to be a customer to use these?
Also perhaps it should be be bicycle_parking=stands instead? bicycle%20parking=*

Thanks for sorting this note note/3379121 - I've added the community centre tag to it as well.

Does this path connect to the road? way/1192752941

They do if tagged highway=construction and construction=cycleway, e.g.
way/1167404140 - of course tagging as a path just now when it's not open is incorrect

If this is under construction then it should be highway=construction and not path

way/232189167 do you know what the surface of this path is?

Hi, thanks for the edit. I've fixed this to shop=vacant rather than yes.

node/11008697004 guest_house= isn't a top level tag, would tourism=hostel be better?

Probably just to be consistent with all the other (shared) pavements around here which don't have them tagged - plus they had crossing:markings=yes (wrong) and crossing=yes (why?!).