Ok, I appreciate what you're doing.
But the problem is you've now deleted some tags and information has been lost (network/operator etc).
And you've added "Metro Station" to each station name, which shouldn't be there.
There's also building=yes tags on each of the stations,

Hi, just wondering why you've added duplicate train stations and buildings?

Hi thanks for helping to improve the map. Just wondering, what do you mean "Tagging pokemon for review"?

Hi, I've removed the two parks you added to the map, and I've added a building and bowling green instead.
If the building is a community centre then the appropriate name/tags can be re-added.

So it's not related to Pokemon Go?

Why have you added a bunch of parks?
Are you looking for some Pokemon?

Why would add a park in the Meadows when it's already a park?

Hi, thanks for helping to improve the map.
I've fixed your edit by connecting the "footpath to ind est" to the path and road at either end, and also connected the path to Tarvit Green.

So there's an actual Royal Mail post box in someone's driveway?

Hi, thanks for the edit.
Since you are a resident, perhaps you could help improve the map further in Kingsbarns?
For example, speed limits are missing - both in and out of the village. There's probably paths that could be added, as well as buildings. There is also what looks like a graveyard beside the church?
If you need any help with adding features, let me know :)

Does Sandy Road actually connect to the B9157? Don't remember seeing a proper entrance, but I haven't been past there in a while.

Hi, just made a small correction to your edits - there were a couple of shops with a space at the start of the shop=* tag which I've removed.

place=locality is for an unpopulated place though

Hi, thanks for adding these buildings. One thing I noticed was this track you added: way/465634464
Tracks are for mostly agricultural use, so I've changed it to highway=service and service=driveway.
I've also connected it to the residential road. If it is unpaved then you can add that information via the surface=* tag :)

Looks like the path is sorted, but just to let you I've removed the access tags you added to Roseburn Maltings

Ok. What you will need to do though is connect it to the roads. At the north end, just extend the path at right angles. And where it crosses Roseburn Maltings, double click on the path so it creates a node, then move that node to join onto Roseburn Maltings.

With the tags, you need to remove access=no, and horse=no isn't really neccessary. I think cycleways are assumed to be bicycle=designated (and possibly foot=yes/designated) but you can add those if you want.
segregated=yes (if it has a line down the middle)
smoothness and width are also useful tags

If it's not a pub then set it to disused:amenity=pub or remove it altogether ;)

Is this path actually a cycle path, i.e. a designated shared use path or is it just a pavement?

Hi, just to let you know that gates need to actually be part of a road or path for them to work properly.
If you move the gate node slightly it should highlight a node on the road, allowing you to drop it onto that node.

Hi, thanks for helping to improve the map.
If this is an area of construction, then the landuse=meadow should be replaced by by landuse=construction :)