OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
122131194

Thanks but I don't think we need to mark it as an attraction.

122220593

Thanks for adding the grounds, fixed it so there is only one school object here though.

122720448

I've removed the address data from the building as it was already tagged on the address nodes :)

122752640

Hi, welcome to OSM. I've extended the wall to block off this section and moved the path back a bit.

122775001

thanks but not quite right :)

122176063

This was raised with CycleStreets: https://twitter.com/OSMScotland/status/1535219713114005506 - basically your end point was geolocated to the private roads, whereas if the end point was the terminal it wouldn't have used the private roads!

121776666

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Not cycled this way recently - wonder if you can help as it might be worth adding the "smoothness" value to this path? smoothness=*

122470082

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit :)

122195700

Please check the co-ordinates and the wikipedia page before adding, as it actually refers to a building on the coast here: osm.org/?mlat=56.0315&mlon=-3.3492&zoom=15#map=18/56.03140/-3.34953

122176063

That is surely a problem with CycleStreets rather than the tagging though, as the OSM website routers manage fine: osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=55.9554%2C-3.3419%3B55.9481%2C-3.3603#map=15/55.9424/-3.3435

122176063

Any particular reason why you added the bicycle restrictions? As it already has access=private

121845408

Thanks for adding this - though I've moved it to the south side of the A96 as per the article photo and linked it to the minor road as per https://www.bearscot.com/a96-lhanbryde-to-fochabers-footway-and-cycleway-project/

118561340

Hi, highway=services is not the correct tag for this - node/9583459500

119430686

Not sure why you changed this to crossing=toucan but I've fixed it. node/4976104204/history

121778857

Thanks for the reply - I just didn't know what had been deleted and couldn't see the history. :)
Agreed there's no point in the duplicate. Doesn't seem like other walking relations have the towns as nodes so it can be deleted.

121778857

Hi, what is the relation that you've deleted in this changeset?

121497899

Worth checking Strava's heatmap as it shows some heat on the trail, and you might want to connect the path to the two tracks :)

121480301

The arrows show the direction in which the road has been drawn, so when you add a one way tag it goes that way (you can reverse the direction if it's the wrong way).

121480301

Do you mean on the south side? If so it should be cycleway:right as the arrows (direction) on the way are pointing east.

120316666

removed these duplicates