Is the gate still there on top of the cattle grid?
I added it based on this and made them two separate nodes
https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6759596

Watch out, not all the major roads are paved - this one is cobbled (sett) ;) way/5048694/history

The bicycle tags were removed from the footway along the A702 because there is no evidence that cycling is allowed here. Has the situation changed recently?

Just a suggestion, it's better to use the "add a note to the map" feature rather than editing the map to add a note :) I've opened a note here with your comment: note/2786463

Hi, where is the locked gate on this road as it would be good to have it add - is it right at the southern end or nearer the farmyard?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. For the buildings with two housenumbers it's better if these are mapped as their own node so each housenumber has an individual address. I've done this for all the ones in Clerwood Park :)

Hi, I've changed the gate you added to a cycle barrier node/1918962852 - might be worth adding a bicycle=* tag to indicate access, see the wiki page: barrier=cycle%20barrier

What issues did you fix?

Do you know where it moved to?

Worth having a look at barrier=cycle%20barrier and seeing if you can add access tags for this :)

Check them afterwards but you can shift + click to select the buildings and press Q to do them all in one go ;)

Although the planters block cars on the ground, in OSM it's the cycleway that stops cars being routed through. In a sense you don't need the planters at all, so tbh I'm not too fussy on how they are represented in OSM. :)

But I put the planter on the cycleway (similar to bollards) as I've seen it's been done that way in London: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19OL e.g. node/7681304707
Dunno if it might help with analysing the data to have the planter connected?

Though I would just say avoid duplication, either a line across or a node on the cycleway but not both.

Just a tip when adding buildings - please use the square function (shortcut Q) after drawing a building.
Also, although the Bing imagery is detailed it is usually slightly out of alignment. You should use the imagery offset tool in the background settings to move it to match the current data and/or the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay before editing :)

I've removed the hospital area you added around the doctors.
Also, although the Bing imagery is detailed it is usually slightly out of alignment. You should use the imagery offset tool in the background settings to move it to match the current data and/or the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay :)

Hi, just wondering if there's a reason why you added a commercial area around Kinloch Anderson and not retail?

Hi, you've added access=no to some paths here, e.g. way/967597612#map=18/55.91219/-3.54247 - are these paths open to walk and cycle along?

Hi, please try and use a better changeset comment if possible - saying "added bus stop" would be much better as "local area corrections" doesn't tell other users what you've changed, thanks :)

Hi, saw your tweet about this location :)
I've changed the planter line to a node on the cycleway (similar to how you would represent a bollard).
There appears to be some traffic calming bumps/humps on nearby roads, might be worth adding those as well.
Also, do you know what this new building is? way/966442916

Hi, just to make you aware that if you're adding paths you really should make the path connect to another road/path - this one for example is connected to nothing: way/957403422
Also, although the Bing imagery is newer and better, it is slightly out of alignment. If you are editing please enable the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" overlay and align Bing with the blue lines (for me it was about 3.50,-1.50). Thanks! :)

Hi, I've fixed the building you attempted to add here, and also added an access road from the east. Let me know if the map accurately reflects what's on the ground, thanks.