GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 54789346 | Hi, there's two Co-ops mapped here, as both supermarket and convenience - which one is correct? |
|
| 50084694 | Hi, not sure if you're aware but the correct tag for a "football" pitch is sport=soccer, I've fixed this one: way/505591477 |
|
| 54657260 | I've improved the school tagging by adding "construction:" :) The green gym is tagged as a sports_centre but I doubt that's appropriate - probably a fitness_station or playground instead? |
|
| 44998218 | Just to let you know that I've changed this line way/464533061 and others around it to the more used man_made=cutline |
|
| 54686447 | Presumably this section should be a part of the E/W relation? relation/5880467 |
|
| 54682467 | Hi, did you survey the Clyde Arc before you made the change to oneway=yes? Because the previous changeset said it was two parallel two way roads: way/4287346/history |
|
| 54607184 | Yeah, if it's not a dock then the coastline should continue into the harbour. I've left the landuse=harbour area where it is, but also added the coastline around it. |
|
| 54657260 | If it's not open then I'd suggest using landuse=construction and construction:amenity=school instead, so it doesn't appear on the map as an active school.
|
|
| 54607184 | Hi, does the harbour have a gate at its entrance and is it tidal? |
|
| 54610532 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just wondering if you meant to change this from a path to coastline - as it definitely looks like a path to me. |
|
| 54515700 | Hi, does this path way/545871315 connect to the road? |
|
| 54446220 | Andrew,
|
|
| 54447703 | Hi, for roundabouts like this: way/545375954 you should tag them with junction=roundabout instead of oneway=yes :) |
|
| 54347576 | Removed |
|
| 54406729 | Hi, these parks you've added seem like someone's front garden to me - and are there really two lakes there on the ground? |
|
| 54406386 | The problem with this edit is that you removed the entire building and shop data which I had added :) I've just seen the other comments - I would say that if you are adding a website there is no licence issue. However if you want to add building data but there is nothing visible on Bing, you can press "B" for the background list in the editor and try another one like DigitalGlobe or Esri. That way there is no potential licence issue with the planning portal. |
|
| 54406386 | Please explain why you have deleted this building? It is visible on DigitalGlobe and Esri imagery. |
|
| 54312851 | One thing I noticed in Stirling: node/4768730523 - assume that's meant to be an outdoor shop, don't know if you've seen it on your travels! |
|
| 54347576 | Hi, this doesn't seem like a park to me... |
|
| 54329112 | Ok, but I don't think this can be classed as a park - it looks like someone's front garden: way/544535842
|