GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 143634185 | I've assumed the path you added here was meant to be steps with a step count of 39 and not connected to the motorway...
|
|
| 155782719 | I mean if they are broken then it would be good to report them to their owner or Glasgow Council so that they can be fixed :) |
|
| 160091093 | this has been removed as South Queensferry already has a residential landuse around it |
|
| 160210542 | Hi, thanks for fixing the note.
|
|
| 74671422 | Is this path (and others nearny) actually a cycleway? way/724000965/history |
|
| 159633511 | Hi, just wondering what the reason is for adding foot=yes to all these footways? |
|
| 154768353 | Shouldn't there be a lifecycle prefix or something as this railway doesn't exist? |
|
| 157636351 | Why did you remove the motor_vehicle=no tag? |
|
| 157375525 | Isn't that a duplicate of node/5667504621 ? |
|
| 156134014 | Hi, not sure if you are aware, but there is an OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer which can be turned on to help you align background layers to the blue lines - in this area the offset is small but in other places Bing needs to be adjusted so map data isn't out of alignment. :) |
|
| 152245023 | What is barrier=coupre? node/11955881547 |
|
| 143484180 | Hi, not sure why you changed these mini roundabouts but this has been reverted. |
|
| 156133552 | Well for now the one thing we cannot do is remove the segment entirely leaving no connection to Leith Walk, so I've added it back but as a footway without one of the kerbs. |
|
| 155677618 | Hi, assume you removed it by mistake - I've added the building tag back on here: way/536129047 :) |
|
| 155515339 | Hi, is this living street actually signed as a such, ie a home zone?
|
|
| 155842448 | Hi, the buildings with two housenumbers should either be split or two separate nodes added for each number (as 1/2 is not the actual address) and also addr:housename should be used instead for those with names. :) |
|
| 155782719 | hopefully you've reported them to the council or Sustrans etc :) |
|
| 155613366 | Hi, thanks for your recent edits and notes fixing. Not sure if you are aware, but there is an OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer which can be turned on to help you align background layers to the blue lines - in this area the offset is small but in other places Bing needs to be adjusted so map data isn't out of alignment. :) |
|
| 154956076 | what is your source for these names? |
|
| 154832039 | you've added three shop=car areas which are duplicating the individual buildings, think one or the other should be removed? |