Hi there!
What did you want to map here ?
relation/5695392 ?
relation/5695391
relation/5695390
relation/5695389

I've tried to fix the errors, please review
changeset/35647478
and
changeset/35647778

Hi there!
Do you know if Rua Bela de São José
is a oneway or not?
Your merge produced the invalid
tag oneway=yes;no
way/166996759

yes, looks nice. Do you know
http://openskimap.org/ ?

Hallo!
Bitte mal anschauen:
way/191690587
Geht da wirklich ein Laufband vom Fußweg zur Straße ?
Das wäre dann ein
highway=footway
conveying=*
Oder ist / war es ggf. ein Fließband, also ein
man_made=goods_conveyor?
Auf den Satellitenbildern liegt es im Schatten.

Hola! Welcome to OSM!
I've just noticed that you have created many roads with tags like
highway=24 de Mayo
instead of
highway=residential
name=24 de Mayo
I see that you use JOSM, so please try the "Validation Results" windows (Alt+Shift+V) to find the errors
and try to fix them.
OK?

"highway=piste means that there is no highway when snow melts"
That's exactly why I don't like the tag.
If I got you right, you think that each part of a piste must also have a highway tag?
I see no reason for that, and most mappers in other areas don't think so as well.

Hi there!
I've noticed that you changed
way/170406787
to oneway=no;yes
I think yes looks correct, so I've changed it to that. OK?

You are probably right. The ways should be tagged piste:type=* . This is an often used tag in opposite to highway=ski or highway=piste.

done, please note that the ways are members of route=piste relations,
in my eyes there is no need to tag the ways with a similar information.

OK, I'll change the ways to highway=piste.
(also the other ways in the other changesets).

Hi there!
I've removed the confusing tag highway=ski
to make sure that routers don't try to route normal traffic on them. The ways were all members of correct route=piste relations. See
changeset/35613375

Hi there!
I've noticed the use of highway=piste and highway=ski in this changeset.
Please review my change:
changeset/35613103
See also
piste:type=*
OK?

OK, thanks. I've added name=Tennängsvägen
to that part of W1040 and kept the attribute
highway=secondary. It doesn't look like
a motorway to me.
See
changeset/35612381

kein Problem, ich lösche den Weg einfach

I guess you wanted to change the name of the way, but did you also want to change the type to highway=motorway?

Hi Alois,
thanks for the feedback.
Please looks at this node:
node/27305535
which is part of this way:
way/174494001

Hi there!
You have used the tag highway=snow_path
for 4 ways, e.g.
way/183478110

This tag is not used anywhere else. My understanding
is that
highway=path
ice_road=yes
might be better here?
See also
ice_road=*

Hi there!
I've noticed the rarely used tag highway=snowmobile
on
way/359423451
and
way/230222252

Do these two ways have no "normal"
purpose? I would expect something like
highway=path (or track)
snowmobile=designated (or yes)
See also
snowmobile=*

Hi there!
I've noticed the way
way/382773314
What did you try to map here?
The attribute ighway=crossing should be used
to mark nodes where pedestrians can cross a highway.
The area enclosed by the way is already mapped as landuse=residential
way/205342327
So I think these two tags should be removed.