Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticied this changeset because you created new tags like highway=construction:tertiary here.
The normal way to tag this is to use two tags highway=construction + construction=tertiary.
The alternative would be to use the prefix construction: like this:
construction:highway=tertiary.
But for highways the 1st method is better established. See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi. sorry, I forgot to add the information where I saw this stretch of the pipeline:
node/65852866
My understanding is that the way should be split, but it is also often far away from the position shown in the sat images.
I think the above ground section starts at node/65852900 and it ends here:
69.518619501305, -148.56688142359258

Hi!
I just noticed that this pipeline way/253952219
has underground=yes .
I see long stretches which are not underground, so I wonder how to find the place where it is really underground?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=parking, please review my changes here:
changeset/63942391
See also amenity=parking
I also noticed that Bing has a large offset here, I think 16.42; -10.75 works quite well.
See osm.wiki/Using_Imagery

Yes, these roads are residential.

Hi again!
I see that you changed the highway type to another unusual value highway=cross_way on
way/637127079
I wonder why you don't map it as a normal zebra crossing?
You seem to concentrate on the bicycle traffic, but you still can use
highway=footway + footway=crossing + crossing_ref=zebra + bicycle=yes
You also added a few separate ways with highway=cycleway. These ways are not properly connected to the other roads, this will cause routing errors. Please check also if you cannot use the cycleway=* tag instead, that makes it much easier to avoid these problems, see highway=cycleway#When_not_to_use

Hi! Please don't invent new _link types for highways like residential_link on
way/638203913
and
way/638203917
You added only one turn restriction. Maybe one is missing at node/10581158?

Ein paar davon habe ich ebenfalls per cs Kommentar kontaktiert, aber mit wenig Erfolg. Kann aus meiner Sicht nur ein Local ändern.

Hi!
You mapped a few ways with highway=yes here. Was that intended?
I changed them here:changeset/63893308

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped a few new roads and buildings here. You did not connect the new roads to the existing roads. Please draw they ways so that they share a node with the another road. Most of the ways that you taghed as highway=track are probably highway=path. See highway=*
Also, you often draw the shapes for the buildings too large, so that they overlap other buildings or the road. Please try to avoid that.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=yes. I've changed them to residential here:
changeset/63892144
See also highway=*

I've fixed them here:
changeset/63891149

Hi!
Please be very carefull when using Level0 editor. You also changed a few correct tags from highway=living_street to living_Street
here.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You created a few ways here without tags,
I think you wanted to map sidewalks?
Please note that there are two different methods to map sidewalks: The complicated one is to draw separate ways next the the major road, the simple one is to add the sidewalk tag to the major road.
See sidewalk=*
In this case the primary road way/455083999
is tagged with sidewalk=both, so there should be no need to draw extra ways.
You may however add nodes on the primary road if you want to map a crossing. Tag this node with highway=crossing and maybe further information. See highway=crossing
You added highway=footway and other tags to the address interpolation ways, I guess you wanted to add them to the new ways. I think best is to revert all these changes, let me know if you need help with that.

Moin!
ja highway=razed passt dann besser,
oder evtl .auch razed:highway=*

OK, thanks for the quick feedback :-)

Hi!
You used highway=water_hazard here, I've changd it to ford=yes:
changeset/63857829
See ford=*

Hi! Please review typo highway=un on
way/13566150
County Road 263 looks like a highway=residential to me, so I wonder why you changed it. There is now three parts : hw=un, hw=service, and hw=residential

Hi!
I've corrected a mistagged footway here:
changeset/63856973
See also highway=crossing

Thanks for the answer. Is that a legal source for OSM? I recently changed a few roads to tertiary without knowing exactly if that is correct. How can I use this source to verify my changes?