Looked again at the names. I assume that
inscription would be better here. See inscription=*

Ah, thanks for the last link.

Sorry, forgot the link:
way/373911488

@Minh Nguyen : Thanks for the link.
I noticed that the number of ways with highway=stopline decreased from ~17500 to < 11000 during the last days. Not sure why.

Hi!
I wonder where this highway=access_ramp leads to and what it is: way/316942164
Is it a special way for wheelchairs (highway=footway + wheelchair=yes) ?
Is there a lift (highway=elevator) at the end?

Moin!
Ich frage mich, ob das selten benutzte highway=access_ramp nicht besser durch
highway=footway + wheelchair=yes ersetzt werden kann.
way/448354438

Hi!
I am looking at ways with the rarely used tag highway=access_ramp.
I assume this is a footway usable for wheelchairs (and maybe also for delivery)
?
Why didn't you use highway=footway + wheelchair=yes ?

A typical problem with this approach is here:
way/500770256
The stop line is now part of the sidewalk (and still not part of the major road)
I don't think that a way with highway=stopline is any better than a node on the road with highway=stop.
It is nearly useless when it doesn't share a node with the (major) road.

Sofern das erlabut ist, kannst Du es ja mit sac_scale erfassen.
osm.wiki/Key%3Asac_scale

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've notice the way way/526943431
because you used the tag highway=* here.
I assume you found this i a wiki page.Please note that * is only a placeholder for a reasonable value, in this case probably "service". You also didn't connect the road with the tertiary in the west.
You also used historic=* on this node:
node/5123576541
I assume you meant historic=memorial.
You gave 3 names in different languages.
Please use just name for the the one that is used by the locals.
Hope this helps?

Thanks for the link.I agree regarding the highway tag. I think each stone cairn might be tagged as historic=milestone (used on a node).
The landuse=farmland tag should be removed.

Argh! Fixed this also. Hope this was the last one.

Maybe you just typed pa for path and JOSM autocomplete selected passing_place.
Do you remember if this way is connected to the road way/411728200 ?
I don't see the path nor the building on any sat image.

Hi!
Please review way/484607462
What did you try to map here?

Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because of the tag highway=cavepassage which is only used here.
I wonder if natural=cave fits better?
See osm.wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Dcave

Hi!
You added some additional ways for cycleways in this area, e.g. way/454491139
Did you notice that the major roads
were already tagged with
cycleway=lane ?
See way/366922037

Hi!
This change looks like an import. Where did you discuss it?
Did you follow the import guidelines? See osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
All buildings have name=house which makes no sense, maybe you meant building=house?

Hi!
Please review the mapping of this bridge
way/110779185
See also https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
Do you know if bicycles are allowed?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the two footbridges
way/157076842
and
way/467751510
see
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309

Ich sehe gerade, Du hast einen Weg geändert, den anderen noch nicht
way/407468277
Nach Deiner Beschreibung würde ich beides eher auf highway=path + trail_visibility=no setzen. Wanderer können ja wahrscheinlich noch durch, oder?