Hi there!
You've created some ways with
highway="pedestrian=proposed"
Please use
highway=proposed + proposed=pedestrian
instead.

Hi Govannus,
please check way
way/394438009
What kind of traffic_sign is this?

Hi Govanus,
please review:
1) a traffic_sign is mapped as a node, not a way, the highway tag is obsolete
2) in this context the direction tag shoud be "forward" or "backward", but it only makes sense when you use traffic_sign=* on a node of a highway

I meant
barrier=central_reservation
as in the example that you referred to. That way has no highway tag, why do you think that it needs one?

If you change it to barrer=* I see no problem.

Yes, why not. There are quite a lot of tags to say that a highway is no longer usable,
abandoned, dismantled, disused,razed etc.
They are either used with highway= or as prefix xxx:highway=*
I don't know what matches here, I am not a local.

Ah, I see. I did not know the in_service tag up to now. Does it mean that the road should be ignored by routing software?
I fear that will not work, better change highway=secondary to
disused:highway=secondary or maybe
highway=construction

Hi there!
You changed three roads from highway=unclassified to the unusual
highway=unset
Was that intended ? If you think that unclassified is wrong, please specify the correct type or use highway=road so that others can check. See also
highway=*

Hi there!
What is meant with highway=clo ?
Was it a typo?
way/26261610

Hi there!
You changed a highway=path
to the unusual highway="cycle route" here.
Was that intended?
way/304087643
Maybe you wanted to change the relation?

Moin und willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast hier einige Wege mit highway=crossing erfaßt. Dieses Tag gehört eigentlich an den Knoten, den sich der Fußweg mit der (Auto-)straße teilt, der Fußweg selbst soll mit
highway=footway + footway=crossing
gemappt werden. Siehe auch
osm.wiki/DE:Key:crossing
viel Spaß beim Mappen weiterhin
Gerd

:-)
Zumindest scheint sich JOSM nicht daran zu stören, wenn highway=* mit building=* kombiniert wird. Ist aber wahrscheinlich schwer, da alle unsinnigen Fälle aufzulisten.
Muss mal schauen, wie das ginge.

Hi there!
You changed a highway=unclassified to highway=* here.
Please check ice_road=*
It suggests to use
ice_road=yes instead of surface=ice_road
and for the highway tag :"its value should reflect importance of the given highway. "
So I guess highway=unclassified was okay.

hmm, so I suggest to remove the way, as we don't copy from other maps. Add it after your visit if it really exists. OK?

Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Nach meinem Verständnis passt dann eher
highway=abandoned or disused bzw.
abandoned:highway=* falls Du die ehemalige Bedeutung noch kennst.
Im Wiki findet man highway=dismantled nicht, nur highway=razed, was praktisch das gleiche bedeutet:
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Drazed
Verschwunden ist die Brücke ja noch nicht, also eher abandoned:
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dabandoned

Ich lasse täglich ein paar Skripte laufen, die mich auf wahrscheinlich falsch getaggte Wege aufmerksam machen, wenn ich dabei systematische Probleme erkenne, versuche ich, die Ursache zu ermitteln, um z.B. den Entwicklern von JOSM einen entsprechenden Hinweis zu geben.

Moin nochmal !
Dieser Weg ist immer noch highway=historic:
way/238749867

Hi Brian,

I noticed that you changed some roads from highway=redeveloped to highway=demolished, which is BTW also not well documented.
What about this remaining last one?
way/349398867

I don't see any progress here. What's your current opinion about this rarely used tagging?

Hi there and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you mapped a road with
highway=main_road. This is very unusual,
I've changed it to highway=residential.
The old value unclassified was indeed wrong. See this wiki for more info:
highway=*
You have also mapped
addr:street=Albert Street
for this cinema:
way/393316821
I did not find a road with that name, please add it or correct the address.
The cinema should also be tagged with
amenity=cinema, see
amenity=cinema