please review:
I've reversed way way/125629695
(again) and changed the tag
oneway=yes; -1
to oneway=yes
Was that what you tried to do?

okay, thanks for the quick feedback.
The tag poped up in my QA check, maybe change it to a note while the situation is unclear

please review:
oneway=yes; no
makes no sense
maxspeed=RO:urban; 50
better use only
maxspeed=RO:urban
way/24995306
I guess you have merged two ways with these different attributes without
adjusting the values?

thanks for the quick feedback :-)

Maybe like in this proposal?
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/alternate_oneway

please explain:
what is meant with
oneway=advised ?
It is only used for two ways
way/367728052 and
way/69972762

please review:
I've changed oneway=np to oneway=no
way/148399286

please review:
I guess oneway=np is just a typo and means oneway=no ?
way/43620651
Bing shows a road that might be a oneway=yes

please review:
oneway="probably not"
on way/317786087
and
way/304646142
Do you know more now?

please review:
What was meant with
oneway=Marsh Lane
way/351500357
I would guess name=Marsh Lane,
but that's the name of
way/351500357
and service roads typically have no name.

please review:
I've removed the meaningless
oneway="-1;yes;no"
from
way/218444706
It was produce by your merging of different
parts. Please change it of the way is a oneway.

please review:
I've changed oneway=t to oneway=yes
way/101079134

please explain:
what does oneway=conditional mean ?
It is only used here.
See also
oneway=*

please review also
oneway=no;-1 on
way/61402565

please review:
what does oneway=two mean?
way/357213656

just noted that user chachafish "Finished with OSM" so I changed the tag to oneway=reversible

please explain:
what does
oneway=yes;reversible
mean?
You produced this tag by merging two
ways to this way:
way/124658727

please review:
what is meant with
oneway="!destination"
The tag is only used here:
way/71664542

please review:
oneway=priority is only used here. It seems to means the same like
oneway=alternating which is also not documented but used 21 times, see for example this tagging which uses an additional note to explain the details:
way/5009690

please review:
I've changed oneway="Strada consortile CASIC" back to oneway=yes
way/26590050
I also think that ref="Strada consortile CASIC" looks wrong, esp. as this way is part of a relation with ref=SS195

My understanding is that the members of that relation should not have a ref tag or
they should have the same as the relation.