Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed a few duplicated nodes on roads created by you, for example this one:
node/5900797932
duplicates node/5900797932
Please watch out to avoid this.
When you change position and type of a road you should also remove the tag source=YahooJapan/ALPSMAP
Most ways with this tag were imported years ago and this import was of poor quality. So I think this source tag is a hint for poor quality and when I improve the way I remove that tag.
Hope this helps, happy mapping!

Hi!
I've just fixed a few typos like highway=proppsed or highway=porp
here:
changeset/63719283
changeset/63719272
Please watch out for this and try to add proposed=* , e.g. proposed=residential
See also highway=*#Lifecycle

I see that you added a lot of ways with a combination of area:highway and highway all over Providence.
This is a really bad idea. The tag highway=* is about routing, the tag area:highway=* is about rendering of areas. You should probably never use both tags on the same object.

Hi! Please try to use the lifecycle prefixes instead of highway=disused on ways like way/595958269
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because of the tag highway=crossing used on this way:
way/636333699
This tag is meant to be used on nodes of highways, not on ways. In this case the node to tag is node/5983185328
I also noticed that you map highway areas
as closed ways with eg. area:highway=primary (OK) and highway=primary (Not OK) like here:
way/636333700
Please remove the highway tag from those ways that map the area.

Moin!
Mir sind hier ein paar "Sandwege" mit bicycle=designated aufgefallen, z.B. way/27668599
Ist das wirklich loser Sand, oder eher surface=fine_gravel? Auf Sandwegen ist doch Radfahren eher schwierig...

Moin nochmal! Du hast ja ein paar highway=stop_line gelöscht, aber nicht alle.
Ich habe mir diesen cs mal genauer angeschaut. Irgendwie sind die Angaben zu Ampeln an der falschen Stelle.
Ampeln sollten als Knoten von highway=* Wegen erfasst werden, nicht als allein stehende Knoten. Man mapt also nicht die Position, sondern die Bedeutung für den Verkehr.

Hi! I've noticed a few ways with highway=island + area=yes created by you. This tag is not often used on . If I got that right the ways describe a kerb, so maybe highway=footway + area=yes + kerb=raised would be better?

Hi again! I fixed another typo
highway=residenta on
way/202073668

Hi! Please watch out for typo highway=residental (missing 2nd i)
Fixed it here:
way/635801906
way/227120145

Reg. the positions: Aerial images may be shifted, make sure to adjust the position.
See osm.wiki/Using_Imagery

Forgot to say that the correct tag would be railway=level_crossing in case there is no bridge...

Hi!
Are you sure that there is no bridge at this point?
node/4919299964
E.g. ESRI sat image seems to show a bridge with a truck on it.

I removed this node, see my changes:
changeset/63670169

Hi! Please review this place:
node/5987640316
Sat images show a rail on a bridge, not a level_crossing

Hallo Lokalfürst,

der Weg war vorher auch highway=path,
nie footway. Nach Deinen Hinweisen sollte wohl noch ein surface=ground dran. Ist der Weg way/43785407
wirklich ein Weg mit Sand als Oberfläche?
Und trotzdem bicycle=designated ?
Oder ist das eher fine_gravel?

Hi again!
You moved the nodes of the primary road, e.g. here:
node/4391674976
Was that intended? The GPS traces stored in OSM seem to show that the ways are now too far from each other.
The ways should be placed in the middle of the road, in case of way/24818619 that means the middle of the 2nd lane. The current position seems to be that of the sidewalks.
The problem is that the map says these roads are crossing many buildings which probably isn't true.

The sidewalk tags look OK, but I can't say if the whole stretch of the road has a sidewalk.
The bridge still was not OK. Please check my changes:
changeset/63668975

I don't see a change. Did you save already?

Thanks, looks more plausibe now :-)