Hi! You changed / added some ways to highway=demolished here. It is a good idea to keep those ways because Mapbox still shows them, but I think this tag is a bit unclear, it might be missunderstood as "bad surface". I've changed them to razed:highway=* here:
changeset/63579566
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Moin!
Mir sind ein paar Wege mit dem unüblichen tag highway=demolished aufgefallen, z.B, hier:
way/224209238
Ist etwas unklar, könnte auch als "voller Schlaglöcher" oder so verstanden werden. Schau mal bitte, ob Du hier einen passenden Prefix findest:
osm.wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

I found a few ways with the unusual tag highway=demolished. I think this tag is unclear, it might be missunderstood as something like "bad surface". Please try to find a proper lifecycle prefix for them. See
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

There is also a highway=demolished next to it. I think this tag is unclear, it might be missunderstood as something like "bad surface". Please try to find a proper lifecycle prefix for this and other roads with this tag created / modifed by you.

Hi!
If I got that right Bing is quite up to date here and it shows some roads and many new buildings in this area. I don't think this road is in status construction, rather razed:highway=residential.

Hi MikeN!
I found a few ways with the unusual tag highway=demolished. This may also mean something like "bad surface" . Please use one of the lifecycle prefixes instead so that the status is clearer.
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi!
The tagging of the bridge is quite confusing:
way/459628736
How can it be both a bridge=yes and a demolished:bridge=yes? You also added highway_1=proposed. Does that mean the status is that it once was a bridge and now it is proposed to rebuild it?

Hi! Please use one of the lifecycle prefixes instead of the unusual highway=demolished for
way/432979568 and
way/444346202
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi! Please use one of the lifecycle prefixes instead of the unusual highway=demolished for
way/15424105
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi! I wonder if highway=underwater_way
could be replaced by abandoned:highway=track
or destroyed:highway=track?

Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=other. Please don't invent new road types! I see that you try to map road areas here.
Why do you add area=yes to ways with area:highway=*?
When you change a highway from tertiary to secondary please remember to change the corresponding area:highway ways as well, see e.g. way/575222925

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You have mapped lots of buildings here, that is good :-)
One small problem: You typically draw the shapes of the buildings too large, so that the shapes also cross roads. Please try to avoid that, the shape should describe the outline of the building at the ground
so that one can draw highways without crossing the buildings.
Happy mapping!

Hi!
Please don't invent new _link types for minor roads. The tag highway=unclassified_link is only used here.

Hi! You used highway=unclassifay instead
of highway=unclassified on 13 ways,
e.g. this one:
way/634143784
Please correct them and watch out ;-)

Hi! I changed the unusual highway=destroyed to destroyed:highway=primary, see also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Moin!
Ich wundere mich gerade über way/564057611
Auf den Sat Bildern sehe ich keinen Bordstein (barrier=kerb) und highway=crossing ist nur für Knoten gedacht. Evtl. traffic_calming=island?

Hi!
I've changed tags for way way/629498815
Did Go Map! suggest to use the tag highway=crossing for a way? That would be an error in Go Map!

Hi! What does collection_times=Rosebay Pond mean on a waste basket?
node/5757054108

Hi! Please check way way/152713143
Is there a tunnel where it crosses the motorway? If yes, please map it. Sat images neither show a bridge nor a tunnel.

Hi!
Please check the western part of way/630726905
This way is shown in IBGE but not on any sat image. Are you sure that IBGE is a good source?