please review way/359909400:
the tag highway=speed_camera is meant to be used on nodes, not on ways.
Is it okay to add the tags to the two nodes
of the way?

please review way/352613357:
I've changed it to
note="was tagged highway=traffic_information_terminal"
traffic_sign=information
This is also not often used, but seems
better to me.

please review way/176772112 (IDPL):
You have removed the landuse=industrial tag, later it was changed to a highway
with weired tags:
highway=highway
horse=24h
oneway=3ways
by other mappers.
What is correct here?

yes, this article says that highway=turning_loop (like highway=turning_circle) is used only on nodes. I've already changed all ways
with the wrong tag.

please review way/268273937:
it was tagged highway=show_ring
Was is meant here?

Please read highway=mini_roundabout
It explains the differences between circular highway types in detail.

please review:
I've changed the tag highway=submerged
to highway=abandoned.
If this road is still usabe, please change it
to e.g. highway=track and ford=yes and maybe add depth

Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Aus den Daten hätte ich nie auf diese Treppenanlage geschlossen, ist aber auch
wahrlich nicht trivial.
Ich würde gar nicht versuchen, dass so
im Detail zu erfassen, sondern einen Weg mit highway=steps, ungefähr da, wo jetzt
way/345024524 ist, mit incline=*.
Die area als solche dann vielleicht noch als
landuse=residential, surface=concrete
Die Relation ist aus meiner Sicht überflüssig.
Ist der Zick-Zack-Weg wheelchair=yes ?

please review way/315786185:
It was tagged
distance=352
highway=milestone
landuse=forest
ref=63
source=GPS
I've removed all but landuse=forest,
don't know where the milestone is :-(

Bitte prüfen:
highway=stairs ist unüblich. Aus der Relation werde ich auch nicht schlau. Wie viele Treppen gibt es denn da ?
Siehe auch osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dsteps

please change the way/376151749:
split it into either highway=corridor or
highway=steps

please review:
highway=stairs is rarely used,
I guess you meant highway=steps,
but that tag is only valid on ways.
I've changed the tags to a note for now.

bitte prüfen:
warum highway=footway_deactivate
bzw. highway=steps_deactivate ?
way/30568031,way 30568029
Passt hier highway=abandoned oder
dismantled oder ähnliches ?
Oder geht es darum, dass access=private ist?

please review: I found a few places where
you used the tag highway=turning_loop
on a way. This tag is meant for nodes only. Maybe add the tag junction=roundabout when that makes sense. See changeset/34885819

please review:
I've changed a few ways with the tag
highway=turning_loop .
This tag is meant for nodes only.
See changeset/34885421

please review:
highway=turning_loop should only be used on nodes, I've changed them to highway=service. Maybe add junction=roundabout if that is appropriate.

please review:
I found a few ways tagged
highway=turning_loop
This tag is meant for nodes only,
so I change them where I find them.

please review:
I've changed highway=unclassifed (typo) and highway=unclassified to service.
It seems that Bing is out-dated?
I did not dare to add the amenity=parking
changeset/34883427

okay, in that highway=track should be okay

please review:
you added several overlapping ways.
I've removed all but those that are highway=residential.
See changeset/34883201