Hi!
Please check typo highway=agricultural
on 4 ways in this changeset.
Did you mean track or dd you want to map access?

Hi!
Please review typo footway=paved on way/494732227
I assume you meant surface=paved?
Looks strange as other roads in this area are not paved.

Hi!
I've noticed a lot of nodes here which are not tagged and not connected to any way.
See area around this :
node/4736342115
Seems you have accidentially deleted the building ways before uploading the data.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed a few ways with highway=services which don't look lite services areas, so I assume you meant highway=service.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ruG
Some of them look more like highway=path or track.
See also osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservices
I've also noticed some waterway=river
which look more like waterway=drain
See here:
way/507847610
See waterway=*
Hope this helps?

Hi!
Please review typo highway=services on several roads here:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ruF
They seem to be highway=track, not service

Hi!
Please review both ways.
1) they are not connected to the road network
2) typo (?) highway=services instead of service
on way/371315208

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I don't know what happened but you have somehow messed up the data.
See esp. this node:
node/5066073932
I think the easiest way to fix this is to revert the changeset. I can do this for you.

Hi!
You recently created two ways with highway=er
way/521115694
way/521661720
I assume you wanted to type re for residential?

Thx for the quick reply. I still don't understand why you don't use the common highway=road in such a case.

Danke, Ich bin zwar dieses Jahr mit dem Rad in der Gegend gewesen, aber kann mich nicht erinnern ;-)

Verkehrsinseln dienen eigentlich schon immer der Verkehrsberuhigung. Allerdings willst Du ja die Fläche mappen, nicht die Bedeutung für den Verkehr.
JOSM meckert nur das übflüssige area=yes an, das steckt implizit schon in landuse.

Hi!
I've noticed this area because there are lots of overlapping landuse=residential areas.
It seems that you have mapped buildings with this tag?
I also wonder if the position is correct, the sat images show an offset of ~35 m.
Some roads like way/472374801
seem to be very differnt from the sat images. Also, this way way/477212904 doesn't look like a service area. I assume you meant highway=service ?
Before you use a sat image as background please make sure to correct the offset in JOSM using GPS or Strava layers.

Moin!
Mir ist hier ein highway=services
aufgefallen, der wohl eigentlich ein highway=service sein sollte. Allerdings frage ich mich, ob die Zufahrt nicht viel eher durch den Parkplatz führen sollte.
way/454811407

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you have added quite a lot
of ways with highway=services
Many of them are not service areas, so I assume you meant highway=service instead.
See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/
and osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservices

Hi!
I think I found some test data here:
way/376446151
It seems you move these objects from one place to another. Please remove it.

Hi!
Please check services ways
way/105269897
and
way/421060167
I assume you wanted to map a service area ?
highway=services
and those two ways should be highway=service (not services) ?

Hi!
Please review highway=services
on way/353250865
Is that a typo (instead of highway=service) or is there a service area next to it?
See also highway=services

amazing. Maybe add this link as a note.
Do you also know more about the ford?

I tried to correct it, please check
changeset/51742453

Hi!
I've noticed that you sometimes use highway=unknown
I wonder if that means the same as highway=road or if you wanted to use unclassified instead.
See e.g.
way/100955587
See also highway=road