Gazer75's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 152441748 | Please do not add small road link segments to intersections unless its a slip separated from the rest. Also the same for bus stops and passing places. |
|
| 151916915 | No problem. New fuel pumps? Didn't see them in pictures from last year. |
|
| 151916915 | Did you add duplicate fuel station on purpose? There are two nodes at this location now. |
|
| 154639215 | If you wanted to map the "shed" the chargers are under it would be a building or something. Not tagged as a charging station. If you do it will appear as a duplicate. I really don't see the point in adding such sheds as they have no value for people. If the whole parking lot where you park to charge was covered then it has a nice function. |
|
| 154639215 | Please don't add duplicate charging area where there is a node. EV chargers should only be a node as well. |
|
| 151725335 | Please don't map this as 3 circuits. 1-2 form one circuit and 3+4 is one. Thus the line only contains 2 circuits. (1+2) and 3, so technically 1.5 circuits as 4 is in the ground. Bipolar HVDCs are considered as a single circuit even though they technically can run at reduced capacity using electrode if one pole is down. |
|
| 153950372 | They can happen in some places. For the "ring" around Birmingham it's historical. Several substations used to have 275kV switchgear and as they get upgraded they have to mix. Several substations are still 275kV in Birmingham.
|
|
| 153950372 | I've fixed all the errors I could find around Birmingham. Please don't modify values unless you know what you're doing. Ask previous person if unsure. |
|
| 153950372 | Looking at more of these changes you've removed the proper voltage tags on several lines that has mixed 400kV and 275kV |
|
| 153950372 | You messed up some voltages and circuit tag on a few line segments. Line between Coventry and Ratcliffe is a 275kV that shares towers with a couple of 400kV lines. I've already tagged the segments back to correct value. |
|
| 153386566 | Is E16 opened again after the plastering of the riverbank? If so then the access tag also needs updating. |
|
| 139896902 | Why did you delete the layer tag in this change? The tunnel is a spiral with several layers. |
|
| 138762989 | Please don't split roundabouts for route relations. All the small segments increases the chance of an error down the line if there is a tagging update. |
|
| 151030053 | So all I found was a Bergens Tidende article behind a paywall, so I guess its open? |
|
| 151030053 | Did they open the old rail tunnel again now? I've seen nothing in the news or on BaneNOR website about it. |
|
| 149493956 | Hei og velkomen til OSM. Riksvegar vil ha "tunk" som vegtype. Du kan lese meir på osm.wiki/Norway/Highways |
|
| 141811210 | You duplicated Tokke power station by mapping it with same tags on the outside buildings. The turbine hall is inside and mapped already. Under ground power plants are mapped at the turbine hall for consistency as this can be several km from the entrance. |
|
| 142095738 | Orkar ikkje diskutere dette meir. Kommunen kan gjere vedtak i slike saker. Det står om dette i §20 og 24. Skaden du peikar på i §3a kunne kanskje vore grei om det var opparbeidd område rundt hytta. Her er det snakk om litt lyng og snaufjell. Stien er vel delvis grodd att sidan det er sett opp sperringar. Desse kan vere i strid med §13, så det er ikkje eit godt argument. |
|
| 142095738 | Du har lest den i form av fast bustad. Når det kjem til hytter og tilgang til utmark så er det lov å gå over "innmark". Det er typisk at den private sfære rundt hytter blir rekna til 10-20m frå hytteveggen. Stien har vore der sidan hyttefeltet vart bygd. Men som har vore sagt lenge i denne konflikten så må de få kommunen til å komme med eit skriftleg vedtak som set til side dette. Dette kan så klagast vidare til fylket og statsforvaltar. Når ein ser matrikkelen så er faktisk grensa for hyttetomta under 10m frå terrasse for både 26 og 67. Det vil vere meir ulempe om folk går der enn mellom hyttene. |
|
| 142096997 | Hes simply restoring what is there qwertet. Deleting what is there because you don't want it there is not local knowledge it is vandalism. This path is a conflict that only proper authorities can solve. Unless they say otherwise the freedom to roam law would apply here. |