Did they rebuild way/942697064 as dual circuit recently?

Looks like you've just selected all nodes in the line and tagged it as a power=pole completely disregarding my detailed mapping. Like the terminal at the transition station. Please don't do this and ruin other peoples work. Thank you.

Why did you change the towers to poles? That is not accurate for that high voltage level no matter the design. Those are towers. Poles are for distribution lines mostly.

Om du tenker way, så kan den sikkert det. Er mykje gammalt N50 som ikkje lenger stemmer. Folk fiksar litt her og der etter kvart. Berre litt viktig at ein har kontroll på relasjonar og forstår korleis dei fungerer.

I'd suggest going with the lifecycle prefix was:*=* on the tags for the ferries. Disused might not be supported in many cases, and many maps will still show a route as long as the ferry tags are there. A was:route=ferry will not.

Careful when editing. You managed to move way/709830242 back to the old 66kV spot. I had made a note on the line warning about this :) Maxar was more up to date in the area than the Norwegian orthophoto. Currently only the low res orthophoto layer is up to date.
Line is already fixed again by me now ;)

This is not a proper tag for peoples driveway. It also blocks proper routing.
Don't confuse owner with access.

This tag would only apply to fenced off areas with locked gates.

Date is variable, depends on how much snow there is. That's why these winter closed roads only have a moth.

It could be moved out from a relation now yes. At the time I originally mapped it, the station only included the north part and thus the north building was partially the outer way. Didn't bother moving it out from the relation and just changed the fenced area when they expanded the station.
Things may change as they continue to renew the station. A relation might be needed still as there will probably be a physical separation of regional (66-132kV) and transmission section of the station in the future. The TSO, Statnett, will most likely only be responsible for the 420kV part later on.
It's happening all over Norway as stations get upgraded and changed due to new regulations.
Statnett is basically taking over responsibility for anything 300kV and above, unless 132kV is the highest, like in som northern parts of Norway.

To explain a bit more. The south building contains an indoor compact gas insulated switchgear for both the 66kV and 132kV grid. The north building had the old 66kV and probably some 22kV switchgear inside.
The old one is afaik going to be removed along with the old outdoor 132kV to make room for a new 420kV outdoor switchgear.

This is actually wrong. A substation is an area and anything inside it is part of this station.

Do not use Bing aerials i Norway! If this "Map builder" can't use the Norwegian Orthophoto then it can't be used here.

Source on this? Last I checked NVDB it was tagged as 582

Ezri imagery shows it nearly complete. Hydro Quebec states construction was completed in 2019 and Romaine 4 is scheduled to begin production in 2022.

Make sure you remove the source and date on the part you modify. The Kartverket N50 is imported data and the date is when that data was created/modified by them. It is no longer valid after you've modified it.

Please stop adding random photo links of things like a stream. You're also going in on someones private road and property taking picture of their homes.
Did you ask for permission from the owner before publishing it?

Ahh, passar med highway=footway + bicycle=yes då tenker eg. Den er tross alt bygd og ikkje oppstått naturleg?

OK, i see what you've done. When they branch off a single phase with neutral you tag it as 14.4kV.
Its all good, ignore my ignorance :)

Mixing line to line and line to neutral will make things rather confusing.

Why did you tag all distribution lines as 25kV when they are in fact 14.4kV?