Huske på at det er highway=toll_gantry for autopass stasjonar. highway=toll_booth er for manuelle ;)

Some more searches seem to indicate the entire Høng Varmeværk has a peak of 14MW hot water, and this is not changing with the addition of this solar array. Those will only allow for around 20% less biomass burning.

The average production per year do not have a key in OSM, only the peak capacity. There is a difference between energy (MWh) and Power (MW). From reading the article this array is also not producing electricity directly to end user. Its probably providing power to an electrical heater supplementing the biomass burners for the central heating plant.

There is no way a solar array like that is capable of 8500 MW. Where did you get those figures?

Det smarte var om du hadde gitt beskjed om at Kvinnherad skulle takast av lokale folk manuelt. Ved å sette nokon som ansvarleg på osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway)/Progress så ville det ikkje vore problem.

What class it should have is a matter of opinion :)
The wiki is to vague IMO. To open to what each mapper feels like, which again creates a very inconsistent map.

Giving a gravel road with a width of maybe 3m and no sidewalks a tertiary class is to much IMO.

Suggest adding max length and weight if you really want to keep Dala- and Austefjordvegen at tertiary.
The segments in Bjørnafjorden has a max length of 12.4m and the whole road is max 32t.

Please read the wiki for Norway. Tertiary is used for roads with scheduled bus routes.
Making local/rural municipal roads tertiary will cause through traffic that should not be there. It is valued quite high in most routing software.
These roads are not wide enough to really support large vehicles.

Road class is not based on quality for secondary and up to avoid a complete mess.

I see you've set several branch roads as tertiary. This is not correct unless it has scheduled bus routes.

Why did you set Dalavegen and parts of Austefjordvegen as tertiary? Do this road have scheduled bus routes? If not then it is not a tertiary.

Why was this added when there is already one in the database?

Ville brukt unsigned eller local ref på Ryfylkevegen.

Please do not use Bing in Norway to map stuff, it is terrible. There are several sources available with better data quality.

Oops! Didn't change the key on this segment after conflating tower heights. Thank you for pointing that out. The key is from the Norwegian SOSI standard.

Ver snill å ikkje bytte klasse på Hulkavegen. Var alt ein note på den som du ignorerte. Bjørntvedtvegen har heller ingen busstrafikk i dag. Den er rekna som lokalveg med farshumpar.

please do not attach roads and buildings to landcover

You need to be careful with editing landcover using iD editor. It is not very good at dealing with multipolygon relations. This is more advanced and should be done with JOSM.

Vegane i Nygårdsparker er vel ikkje rekna som gågate? Lurte på kvifor du endra desse til highway=pedestrian

Du er klar over at det vil lage masse ekstra arbeid ved ein eventuell import av N50 i nabokommunane sant? Heile corine bitane burde vore sletta.

Kvifor var dette nødvendig? Du har laga meir rot på grensa en nødvendig og rota til relasjonar etter dette.

Please do not add municipality road refs to the normal ref= tag. Use unsigned_ref= instead.