Gaung Tebono's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 184972740 | You haven't answered my question in the discussion column. |
|
| 184971029 | The bright spot has been determined, but the bright spot still relies on government decisions. |
|
| 184970260 | Edit wars are not allowed to occur. It's better to just discuss it because actually this problem hasn't found a bright spot yet. |
|
| 184970027 | For the Ngawi urban area, it is better to use a classification one level higher than the classification of roads outside the Ngawi urban area, here the Ngawi urban area is the Ngawi district which is the capital of Ngawi regency |
|
| 184970027 | The clear point is that it is not based on the classification that the government made. |
|
| 184946412 | Your benchmark is based on a government decision (SK) or what? In OSM, government decisions cannot be used as the main reference in editing road classifications. |
|
| 184956345 | Discussion in Indonesian, visit
|
|
| 184958349 | Discussion in Indonesian, visit
|
|
| 184958349 | Open Street Maps has different terminology, because Open Street Maps was created to be flexible and not to refer to government regulations regarding road classification. |
|
| 184958349 | To discuss related matters, please visit https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/road-classification-in-indonesia/145030 |
|
| 184946730 | To discuss related matters, please visit https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/road-classification-in-indonesia/145030 |
|
| 184956953 | To discuss related matters, please visit https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/road-classification-in-indonesia/145030 |
|
| 184956754 | To discuss related matters, please visit https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/road-classification-in-indonesia/145030 |
|
| 184956345 | To discuss related matters, please visit https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/road-classification-in-indonesia/145030 |
|
| 184956345 | For urban areas, road classifications should not be confused with those in non-urban areas. Urban areas are home to numerous community activities. I edited based on the level of urgency and traffic because in urban areas the traffic is relatively high compared to non-urban areas. |
|
| 184956953 | This route is the only connection between the capital of Blora and Ngawi. If you go via highway=trunk you have to go around Cepu first and even then it is too far so it is less effective. |
|
| 184934916 | Please do not equate the classification of roads in urban areas or regency capitals with other areas in the same regency. Because its function, especially economic and commercial activities in the district capital are the same as those in other cities. |
|
| 184933222 | In fact, the highway=tertiary tag is based on the level of traffic between villages and sub-districts which is relatively low and the distance between several villages and sub-districts is not too far, so it is suitable to use the highway=teritiary classification |
|
| 184933222 | Special assessment based on what? I answer this question yes. This assessment is based on the relatively high traffic levels if using highway=primary, not on my own assumptions. If the traffic is relatively low, you can use the highway=secondary classification for connecting routes between sub-districts in one regency. And highway=territorial is suitable for classifying roads between villages and sub-districts in sub-districts that are not too far apart. |
|
| 184933222 | And this data was obtained from direct monitoring in the field (survey) |