OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64252254

Hello @lorenzo rafael

Thank you for your edits. I noticed that you're working on VCAD projects, but you're also duplicating existing roads by adding them again.

Kindly only add road features whenever they don't exist on the map yet, and simply edit them when they already exist.

If you're keen to know more, there's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: osm.wiki/PH/channels

64342947

Great edits, thanks!

May I know how you ended up working on this particular task? Is there a local mapping event ?

64341994

Good job, with your edits. Thank you!

63744667

Road segment classification changed from secondary_link to motorway_link , misintepreting imagery. Eventually corrected in changeset/65684358
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63744667

63746754

Another case of certain segments being deleted and replaced.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63746754

63746922

Another case of certain segments being deleted and replaced.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63746922

63746877

Why delete way/636724435 and way/636724435, only to have them added back later in a newer changeset?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63746877

63785350

way/637107125 looks like a service road, rather than residential. Other edits look okay.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63785350

63814868

Another case where part of a segment was deleted, then later re-added as new segment.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63814868

63815061

way/637347194 seems better tagged as service
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63815061

64185771

way/641104670 doesn't seem like a road. Other edits look okay.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64185771

64186885

Added unnecessary oneway=yes tag on roundabout. Deleted a road segment, then replaced it with a new one.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64186885

64187103

Deletion of way/283153259, which appears to be a valid feature from the imagery. Other edits in this changeset seems okay.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64187103

64189091

Another huge changeset covering edits in Thailand and Panama's coastline!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64189091

64197629

Editors should avoid working on huge areas in one changeset - edits in WA, USA and Kedah, MY. Also, described as "editing lanes" but no such lane editing was made in that changeset.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64197629

64216940

Added redundant oneway=yes tags on junction=roundabout ways , which are already implied for all such tags: way/200605189, way/200605190, way/200605197
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64216940

64281932

In the same changeset, editor appears to add features using multiple imagery sources - but does not factor offsets between imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64281932

64763083

Is the editor a validator? Changeset appears to be mostly deletions, but from the imagery appear to be valid edits, although many are incorrectly tagged - buy why delete when they may be corrected instead?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64763083

64315740

New road based on outdated Bing imagery and appears to be temporary, as road and building it serves is no longer visible in newer imagery (ESRI, DG, Mapbox)
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64315740

64391678

Although, way/643248396 was subsequently deleted in c64763083, the original editor appears correct, and Mapillary imagery does show what seems like a service road, albeit incorrectly tagged as residential.

way/242719186 tagged as scrub, could also have been deleted, as well.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64391678