OpenStreetMap
GOwin's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 63746922 | Another case of certain segments being deleted and replaced.
|
|
| 63746877 | Why delete way/636724435 and way/636724435, only to have them added back later in a newer changeset?
|
|
| 63785350 | way/637107125 looks like a service road, rather than residential. Other edits look okay.
|
|
| 63814868 | Another case where part of a segment was deleted, then later re-added as new segment.
|
|
| 63815061 | way/637347194 seems better tagged as service
|
|
| 64185771 | way/641104670 doesn't seem like a road. Other edits look okay.
|
|
| 64186885 | Added unnecessary oneway=yes tag on roundabout. Deleted a road segment, then replaced it with a new one.
|
|
| 64187103 | Deletion of way/283153259, which appears to be a valid feature from the imagery. Other edits in this changeset seems okay.
|
|
| 64189091 | Another huge changeset covering edits in Thailand and Panama's coastline!
|
|
| 64197629 | Editors should avoid working on huge areas in one changeset - edits in WA, USA and Kedah, MY. Also, described as "editing lanes" but no such lane editing was made in that changeset.
|
|
| 64216940 | Added redundant oneway=yes tags on junction=roundabout ways , which are already implied for all such tags: way/200605189, way/200605190, way/200605197
|
|
| 64281932 | In the same changeset, editor appears to add features using multiple imagery sources - but does not factor offsets between imagery.
|
|
| 64763083 | Is the editor a validator? Changeset appears to be mostly deletions, but from the imagery appear to be valid edits, although many are incorrectly tagged - buy why delete when they may be corrected instead?
|
|
| 64315740 | New road based on outdated Bing imagery and appears to be temporary, as road and building it serves is no longer visible in newer imagery (ESRI, DG, Mapbox)
|
|
| 64391678 | Although, way/643248396 was subsequently deleted in c64763083, the original editor appears correct, and Mapillary imagery does show what seems like a service road, albeit incorrectly tagged as residential. way/242719186 tagged as scrub, could also have been deleted, as well.
|
|
| 63747914 | Geometry offset errors could've been improved.
|
|
| 63222048 | Major offset difference could've been corrected.
|
|
| 64219494 | Editor is noted to have deleting existing roads and re-adding the same instead of just improving them - which isn't a good practice. Of course, there are known cases where deleting and adding a road is acceptable, but that isn't even the case here.
|
|
| 64222985 | Covered two discontinous areas, which ideally could've been split to two. Edits to the west are okay, but edits to the east removed the valid driveway tag, and changed the previously better geometry. The editor misinterpreted the angle of features in the imagery and the perceived space between features. Checking other imagery could've avoided this. This is typical for beginners and easily addressable with proper on-boarding.
|
|
| 65178844 | good point @frebeer! Will follow-up with DWG. |