IIRC, this was used as GRC boundary. Since there's no relation attached to the way and there exist an updated one relation/11033362; I think it's safe to remove it.

@Glassman I don't see this feature in iD editor

Halo, perubahan ini saya balikkan. Untuk pemula disarankan memetakan wilayah kecil dahulu.

Changeset ini bukan hanya ada di Tangerang Selatan, namun juga area Dukuhbenda di Brebes.

Hati-hati dalam rollback revert, yang terjadi malah akan membalikkan geometri yang kemudian menjadi tidak sempurna.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179146933

Silakan ikut berdiskusi di
changeset/178496473. Walaupun sudah Anda ubah, tetap akan diubah oleh seseorang.

Halo selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Untuk pemula, silakan ikuti tutorial interaktif di editornya, tekan tombol H.

Sepertinya editan ini malah membuat jalan di Desa Ngepringan hanya boleh jadi satu arah saja.

Halo, selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Disarankan untuk tidak menambahkan data pribadi di OSM, seperti contoh nama pemilik rumah.

@peanuthole

I apologize for the confusion regarding South Ledge being included within the Singapore relation boundaries. In earlier renderings (for example on OpenTopoMap), it appears to fall within Malaysia; however, those maps may be based on older or differing boundary datasets.

Per the 2008 ICJ Judgment, the Court ruled that sovereignty over South Ledge belongs to the State in whose territorial waters it is located. However, the maritime boundary (delimitation) between Malaysia and Singapore in this specific area has not yet been formally finalized or publicly published in Singapore’s OneMap or Malaysia’s JUPEM data. As such, the precise boundary in this location remains effectively a gray area from a legal and cartographic perspective.

The most recent publicly available maritime boundary update I could find relates to Indonesia (2017, with a newer 2025 version). Malaysia appears to still reference its 1979 map, while Singapore does not publish extended maritime boundary lines beyond the mainland in its open data portal.

Given these differences in available sources, I am open to further clarification or references to any more up-to-date or officially published boundary data.

I think it’s just a newbie mistake. Even though the DWG sent a warning, his edits weren't reverted. Since he hasn't replied to the two discussions yet, and as a rule of thumb for Indonesian threads, it would be helpful to include an Indonesian translation alongside the English.

Saya rasa ini hanya kesalahan pemula. Meskipun DWG sudah mengirimkan pesan peringatan, suntingannya belum dibalikkan (revert). Semenjak dia belum membalas dua diskusi yang ada; sebagai saran diskusi di Indonesia, akan sangat baik jika ditambahkan terjemahan bahasa Indonesia di samping bahasa Inggris

Ternyata tersangkut juga ya di changeset/178962374. Changeset revert-nya terlalu besar, jadi saya tidak bisa membantu. Jangan kehilangan semangat. Mungkin lain kali didiskusikan dulu dengan komunitas OSM Indonesia perihal kegiatan impor via Telegram.

Restoring construction status. It appears the changeset transitioned this bridge to a standard highway without the benefit of local knowledge or ground truth. Unfortunately, this led to immediate routing issues and safety concerns. I have reapplied the correct highway=construction attributes to Jembatan Kewek to reflect the current physical reality. I would be ever so grateful if we could ensure the structural work is actually finished before marking it as open to traffic. Cheers!

Halo, selamat datang di OSM. Untuk cara memetakan yang benar, silakan ikuti tutorial interaktifnya, ya!

Boleh dijelaskan arti Blok Kibuyut? Apakah ini semacam RW?

Halo, selamat datang di OSM. Untuk penambahan dan perubahan data di OSM, dilarang ada data pribadi seseorang seperti nama pemilik rumah.

Jika Anda mengedit/membuat fitur menggunakan iD editor (secara manual), maka komentar perubahan tidak akan "Imported farmlands". Sementara itu, di changeset-ya akan disebutkan dengan jelas jika Anda menggunakan iD editor atau JOSM. Selain itu, harap gunakan ceklis periksa review_requested=yes.

If you edit/create feature using iD editor (manually), then the changeset comment should be not "Imported farmalnds." Meanwhile, the changeset would be clearly stated that if you are using iD editor or JOSM. Also, please consider using the checklist of review_requested=yes.

mikro-mapping yang bagus

Tidak bisa asal impor data dari sumber yang tidak dicantumkan dan penjelasan lisensi datanya. Ikuti petunjuk osm.wiki/Import. Perubahanmu sudah dibalikkan oleh tim DWG.

Tidak boleh semua garis ditambahkan tag batas administrasi. Kalau itu memang pagar atau dinding batas lahan, gunakan barrier=fence.

@cnvery 您好，请尝试将变更集保留到本地。如果边界框这么大，审查就会变得更加困难。这不是您第一次这样做，人们不断评论您的编辑变更集！