Thanks for teaching me something new :)

This viewpoint is accessible sometimes; the gorse gets back every once in a while, albeit not frequently not enough in my experience.

Forgot to check further; nodes 336077923 and 4106673092 also have UPRN's added now. All three of these nodes are part of the road, and all have another road/footway connected to them.

Hiya mate, did you add a UPRN to the wrong object? You tagged node/6704304046 with UPRN 320331894.

Oops, meant NCN 77.

Thanks, I'll leave myself a private note to survey this in person at some point to determine this for sure.

Hiya mate, are you sure this is a path? The imagery looks to me like this has a bridge leading to the house, and (while not a valid source for adding data) local Street View shows the path to be a pair of tracks rather than a singular path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176026327

I didn't know there was any open data available to assign postcodes, figured Royal Mail would hold their monopoly forever. Thanks a lot for your work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175566727

Ah! So that explains those odd forest cut lines that don't have any power lines/pylons through them, neat. Mayhaps I'll double check the pipeline markers I've seen and look for patterns.

So much data to pore through 😁

Oh that's neat! I love infrastructure stuff, where'd you find this sort of information? Mapping power like this would be nice :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174621851

Hi mate, please don't upload changesets where your changes span large areas as you have in the last few uploads, they make it very difficult for local mappers to keep up to date on updates in their local area, thanks :)

osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173789932

Ah, that makes sense, cheers. That explains the absence of display windows.

Well, I've learned something new then, thanks!

Hiya mate, are you sure addr:unit="Unit 1" is appropriate? Per TagInfo, there's ~1000 uses of addr:unit="Unit 1" and ~520000 uses of addr:unit=1.

It looks like something bugged out in Every Door and you submitted the same edits multiple times across multiple changesets, now there's several (~7) duplicates of a bunch of stuff (like node/13108537012). I've removed the excess nodes I've come across but I don't know how many more there are.

Spotted the Woodside while I was cycling by, didn't realize it was actually closed down, thanks for letting me know. I've kept the name tag (it's visually prominent) and added disused:tourism=hotel to stop it showing up as a hotel.

Righto, I'll just leave the private property stuff as a note then and leave access as permissive, cheers 👍.

Yeah, still there, from today https://imgur.com/a/wCA4mW9

I did recall freedom-to-roam though, this means access could just be left as permissive and leave the private sign as note.

You're right about the fencing, I see the very deliberate gap on the map, but see the street view (https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@56.0238204,-3.4318502,3a,71.2y,141.45h,88.09t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sSW_axill3VLqvawHNaONzg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.913866242945403%26panoid%3DSW_axill3VLqvawHNaONzg%26yaw%3D141.4549934927017!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQwOC4wIKXMDSoJLDEwMjExNDU1SAFQAw%3D%3D) (looked exactly like this when I visited today).

The green sign indicates private property, no trespassing, and there's a small fence gently 'discouraging' pedestrians from continuing to the castle. The one page I could find talking about the castle suggests getting permission from the security first.

Suppose this is a case of 'technically private' vs 'no-one actually cares'.

Hiya andrum, I see you tagged Rosyth Castle with permissive access, but the sign there indicates the land is Rosyth Ports property, private property, and no trespassing, did you have a particular reason for tagging permissive?