OpenStreetMap
Ethan Grobin's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 185470650 | > Personally, I didn't look at the individual changes; I was going to do so later, but luckily marcmarti did the work. If you haven't looked at 60 changes, wait til you do to leave a comment, or your comment is useless. > OK, but your changeset comment wording was bad then. ... You should have written "move four square pitches to separate objects" instead. Fair > One could assume you'd mass-deleted the tag with no legitimate reason Not if they looked at the changes, which is needed before a comment >Let me note that there exists "any tags you like" principle (osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like). Although it is good to improve the mapping like you did, even without discussion, your changeset comment wording made your changes look suspicious and contrary to the principle. I know about ATYL. It is unrelated. You should make your changeset comments less condescending in future, you write as if you are an expert explaining to a beginner whilst not checking what you comment on and not (yet) being an experienced mapper. |
|
| 185470650 | Fixed Comment: Hello, sorry. I do not think it is a silly tag if the imagery is to poor for separate mapping, and I did not just delete the tag, I replaced it with the relevant tags. > but also sport=four_square is documented (sport=four_square). I know, did you look at the changes at all? I added the courts seperatly. > By the way, has this "cleanup" been discussed somewhere? The tag appears 20 times in osm, and I improved the data where possible and if not possible left the tag. A discussion is not really needed > Also, please do not make a changeset spanning the entire world There is nothing wrong with big bboxs and I am not spliting changesets into many tiny changesets. |
|
| 185470650 | Sorry the comment I just made had some format issues i will fix it. |
|
| 185470650 | Hello, sorry. I do not think it is a silly tag if the imagery is to poor for seperate mapping, and I did not just delete the tag, I replaced it with the relevant tag. > but also sport=four_square is documented (sport=four_square). > By the way, has this "cleanup" been discussed somewhere? The tag appears 20 times in osm, and I improved the data where possible and if not possible left the tag. A disscussion is not really needed > Also, please do not make a changeset spanning the entire world There is nothing wrong with big bboxs and I am not spliting changesets into many tiny changesets. I know, did you look at the changes at all? I added the courts seperatly. |
|
| 168115824 | You also did not merge the address node with the building |
|
| 168115824 | Do not use AI buildings unless they are correct |
|
| 168115824 | This outline is terrible, why did you add it? |
|
| 167215883 | I forgot to split changeset |
|
| 167215883 | fuck |
|
| 166721338 | I've already fixed it :) |
|
| 166721338 | Why did you delete the roof over the netball court at mentone park in this changeset and delete 13 1-3 Southern Road? These all exist.
|
|
| 165802320 | Should the australia edit be reverted? |
|
| 165370692 | note #4710009 |
|
| 161260354 | Please don't vandalize the map, see here: osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F |
|
| 102081485 | Hello!
|
|
| 157125295 | Yes, thr business go on nodes as far as I've seen. The addresses go on the building tho. I don't remember what you did here exactly, but I think you removed address data? I will check when I am at my computer. |
|
| 157109361 | Both are accepted, but I've never seen anyone use points for addresses when there is a building in Australia. Also, IRL the address info refers to the building. I can ask the osm Oceania community if you want. |
|
| 157118104 | Sounds fine then |
|
| 157123591 | Sorry you mapped correctly, I missread the edit. Ignore my above comments.
|
|
| 157109361 | Ok edit, although you should put all the info on the buildings themselves and not on nodes.
|