Hi there, please do not modify existing water features this way. This should be set up as a multipolygon, not as a polygon with a random hole.

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114588717

Hi there again. This is not how to draw a country club. The club boundary should follow the legal boundary of the property, where edges of the homes are, not all the way around the neighborhood. Can you fix this? Take a look at where the edges of the course are if you are unsure where the boundary is.

Hi there, Why add golf tags to these water bodies that aren't near a golf course? Why add buildings where there are none. It is fine to add waterways and building where they exist, but not where they aren't. Adding fake features is considered vandalism, which could result in a full scale roll back of your work. Do you understand?

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi there, this lake is not a lateral water hazard, it's just a lake. Why would you edit it this way? This is considered vandalism by the community. Will you roll these changes back?

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi there, please don't make edits like this without describing the purpose of the changeset. This adds a fairway where there isn't a golf course underneath. Why? Have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

and

leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

Designer,

In this version you deleted some roadways for no apparent reason other than the comment "virginian" on your changeset. Why did you do this? This change will be reverted as it is damaging to the map.

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114758620

This is the wrong way to draw a rough area, it should be set with the fairway as a multipolygon ring. Please review leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115057655

Hi there, this sort of golf course editing where you are replacing multipolygons with regular sand areas that merge is damaging the map. Please refrain from doing so and clean up the mess here by rolling this back.

Further edits of this nature will result and a roll back of all these edits. Please review leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for tips.

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114483846

Boopington, if you're going to be dualizing roads, please review the Mapbox Intersection Modeling guide. These examples are vetted by the community and routing data users. Take a look at the W Lincoln Trail Blvd and redo that intersection based on this.

https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114983592

Ticket#2021121310000109

Thanks!
- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

Dave, this edit damages existing roads by converting them to cart paths. Please refrain from this sort of thing.

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114372442

Dave, in this changeset you've changed some lakes to golf greens. This is highly innapropriate as the Johnson Lake is quite obviously a lake, not a grass green. Could you explain why you've made this change and let me know if you plan to fix it?

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114806490

Dave,

In this edit you've deleted a lot of useful data from the map and replaced it with other data. Why did you do this?
--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114464743

AvidFan,

The way you're drawing these fairways is disruptive to other mappers and incorrect. For features inside of other features, use multipolygons. These regular polygons with little holes cause downstream issues for other data consumers.

Please see leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for instructions on how to avoid this pitfall.

Let me if you plan to fix this.

Thanks,

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114590476

AvidFan, please do not add temporary features to the map. OSM is not a playground or a sandbox. It is a live dataset used by millions of people across the planet. These "temporary" edits will inevitable proprogate to maps all over the world.

If you want to test something, try the dev server. osm.wiki/Using_the_dev_server

Please immediately remove any temporary features and comply with local editing norms or face reversion on these edits.

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group

FYI, a new mapper has made some edits at Bulle Rock roads that seem to break local norms. Can you take a look? changeset/114853414

Hi there, and welcome to OSM. In this changeset you've made a couple errors that we need to resolve.

1. The golf=path is not an approved or recognized tag by other mappers
2. foot=designated is innaproprite for golf paths. That would mean walkers/runners could use the paths any time. That is not the case in any golf course, they typically prohibit pedestrians. These should be foot=private.
3. Don't change residential roads to service (a downgrade) without discussing with other mappers in changeset comments. That sort of thing can be disruptive to other.

See leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for more info

Let me know you've received this and will work to make the needed updates, or if you have any questions in the next few days. Otherwise we'll have to roll back this work.

Thanks,

--
Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114853414

DWH,

I agree with WoodWoseWulf here, this star shaped building seems unlikely. Please respond here.

WoodWoseWulf,

If you do the revert, please email data@openstreetmap.org and mention Ticket#2021121510000141 in the subject line, as we're tracking this issue as well.

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group