OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
112972527

Solid work! I recommend adding the smoothness tag as well, as it looks good in cycle maps

103868517

"zoning=waste_waterplant" is not a valid tag and suggests little understanding of American land use laws and norms. In the United States, industrial areas are defined not by zoning but the parcel/property owner. Most of these sites are fenced and have signage along the boundary that says no trespassing, so it is disingenuous to essentially untag them.

way/484725220#map=16/38.5315/-76.5685

103868517

This entire power plant was deleted: relation/1043175/history

103868517

Hi there, I'm curious as to how you've just joined the project and have decided to make these sweeping changes to the map. This sort of landuse work is complicated and requires local consensus and discussion. Deleting relations is never appropriate for an established place. Care to explain any of these drastic changes?

59256920

Hey Sparks, take a look at a recent edit here, does this look good to you? Dropped the park tag.

59256920

changeset/112788527

112788201

I am not suggesting all accounts that do this are fake, but I’ve tracked dozens of upstart accounts that are created solely to change the tagging of parks. You, map per, are obviously not a fake account.

Notwithstanding, what is it about the tagging of parks in the US that draws you to make these sorts of edits? What is your interest? I am genuinely curious and want to understand. I see you’re typically most active around Munich. Not that there is any restriction to work elsewhere in the world but why this park?

108384740

Have a look, someone changed it again. I changed it back though. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/6077602
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108384740

112788201

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/6077602

Here you can see that your account and several other generic/probably fake or throwaway accounts have a history of removing the tag.

112788201

Hi there. This national park is commonly accepted as a leisure=park here and has been tagged that way for a long time. It is not a "fix" to remove the tag. This is a linear park where most of the land is used for active recreation. If you look through the history this has been untagged as a park and then it is added back over and over. Please, don't contribute to that. If you want to raise the issue in tagging or talk-us, please do, but the locals agree it is a park.

112668602

Either at the top or the bottom is fine. Those don't have a lot of use though, it is usually better/simpler in my opinion to make separate routes for the bypasses and such and then use a superroute to capture them all.

112668602

Update, one other thing. I made the non-casual part of the RCG route an MTB relation. changeset/112718732#map=16/39.0225/-76.9972

112668602

Got it. I took a crack at reordering the various route relations so that everything should be pretty good now. Put in some new geometry from MoCo too. changeset/112718562

112668602

Looking good here, though I think the RCG is now double mapped with the NBT Mtn. Bike Trail. Should the Rachel Carson Greenway (RCG) overlap the Northwest Branch Trail (NBT)?

111470020

Darn clipboard! This one :)

relation/13327825

111470020

Thanks! Sorry meant this relation (the spur) relation/1778673

You can see I put it on the north side of the new configuration for now. I’ve put out an inquiry with the ECG folks but since it’s under construction you’re right they probably won’t sign it right away. If you see anything pop up let me know. DC has all the best bike infrastructure!

Thanks again,
Elliott (in Baltimore)

112527937

I have emailed PG parks to see if they know.

112527937

PG Parks still shows it closed :p

112527937

Oh, damn. I was assuming Greenway People have better intel. If that's the case I'll just revert this one.

111843560

Wanted to update and say I fixed the offending cycleways along 4th St SW. Most of the ones I came across in the area are good though. The protected lanes should always merge back to the roadway wherever the separation ends. All set here but keep in mind for future.