ElliottPlack's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 50199642 | Good work here! If you know of some more neighborhood boundaries to add, the community welcomes these kinds of additions. |
|
| 50199875 | Hey there, solid work on these edits. I added the connecting sidewalks to show the standard for mapping these kinds of features. Make sure that your footpaths connect to another highway-way. This allows routing across the network. Thanks! |
|
| 50185966 | Hello again. Have you visited Greenspring Valley lately? I was just there and removed the raquet club as a building and change it to construction because that building is being demolished. The parking lot is also closed. While the community welcomes contributions, we'd ask that you don't change the status of a building or landuse without checking it out in reality first. I'll go ahead and roll this one back. Thanks! |
|
| 50162766 | Hello again and thank you for your contributions. These particular changes are not appropriate, however. As you may know, Lutherville, Timonium, and Mays Chapel are not incorporated towns, nor are any in Baltimore County. The OSM community has discussed this at great length and reached the (somewhat arbitrary) conclusion to let the population of a CDP be the guide to the difference between hamlet, village, and town. In Baltimore County, any CDP with a population of less than 10K is a village. Anything over is a town. If you're interested in discussing more, feel free to discuss with the Maryland community on OSM. Look us up on the OSM wiki. Thanks! |
|
| 50162704 | Hello there, I can address this. The names you see on various maps are governed by the style guide for those maps. The data itself is correct though. What map do you see this issue on? |
|
| 50162656 | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing. I see that in this changeset you removed the Heatherfield neighborhood. If you have knowledge that this is not a commonly used name, feel free to remove the name, but leave the polygon. I went ahead and added back the polygon without that name. Thanks! |
|
| 47817695 | These tags with the builder name are pretty cool. Bravo |
|
| 35004351 | Awesome, thanks for looking out! I think that the prohibition might be a paper one. Let me know what you find. |
|
| 44050226 | Good day. What does the changeset comment, "..." mean? |
|
| 45299644 | Hello again. Thanks for reverting. The Bing imagery is old here, perhaps 2013? You can use this handy overlay tool to check the date of the Bing imagery: osm.wiki/Bing_imagery_analyzer_for_OSM |
|
| 45299644 | Hello there. The source data for this edit is all outdated. Would you consider reverting this edit? If you take a look at the Mapillary data here, you will see that the way that the map used to look was correct. |
|
| 34188082 | Hey there. I noticed you deleted the existing ways in this changeset. Why delete them and do it over? |
|
| 45117814 | forgot to mention in changeset: reviewed road types around the Tudor farms site and changes some to track / service depending on their appearance |
|
| 45110126 | I only learned of it when trying to figure out what those crazy triangles are for |
|
| 45110126 | Hey Pyram, it is covered by a lot of wetlands, but the land is owned by a massive christian youth camping organization: https://tudorfarms.younglife.org/Pages/default.aspx |
|
| 44837047 | Hi Imagico, thanks for the message. Despite the somewhat open-ended sounding changeset comment, I do believe these edits were faithful to the coastline continuity rules but let me know if I made an error. I have been doing the coastline work along the bay in manageable chunks. Looking at z5, I didn't think that it would affect the look on OSM.org strongly. I have discussed these changes with some local editors but if you take a look at the coastline along here, you'll see that it doesn't get much attention. Separating it out as a water polygon would make it a bit easier to manage. However, I will refrain from future coastline updates for now and speak to the community in more detail before resuming. We did have one talk-us thread about this which then (I thought) gave me approval to separate the smaller rivers. Best, Elliott |
|
| 44910849 | Great work here!! |
|
| 44848218 | If you look up and down the bay, I've been working on a project with others to removed these tidal rivers from the coastline, I think that we can simplify things by taking away the coastline and turning the rivers into multipolygons, which are easier to edit the edges of. |
|
| 44848218 | I imported a lot of the park and reserve lands through this area but it needs a ton of work, there is so much water. |
|
| 44848218 | Hey Choess, thanks for the help in this section the coastline is crazy complex. I just had a conflict with your edits, we were working on the same bridge (MD 335) at the same time, pretty coincidental! |