ElliottPlack's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 152613886 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/152616056 where the changeset comment is: massive global vandalism reverted |
|
| 152613895 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/152616056 where the changeset comment is: massive global vandalism reverted |
|
| 152613901 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/152616056 where the changeset comment is: massive global vandalism reverted |
|
| 152613880 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/152616056 where the changeset comment is: massive global vandalism reverted |
|
| 152613870 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/152616056 where the changeset comment is: massive global vandalism reverted |
|
| 152613860 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/152616056 where the changeset comment is: massive global vandalism reverted |
|
| 152613906 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/152616056 where the changeset comment is: massive global vandalism reverted |
|
| 150279661 | Some of the changes being discussed here have been modified here changeset/152005125 |
|
| 148672311 | Hi there, these new roads look like part of a subdivision. Would they be better tagged as residential? |
|
| 151524997 | Thanks for the mapping here!! One comment would be the bleachers at Unitas Stadium. I visited the main grandstand recently and think it is better tagged as building=grandstand because there is an indoor portion where the club level is, with an elevator etc. What do you think? |
|
| 151294428 | No worries! It is a nuanced differential |
|
| 151294428 | Hi Oretty, I received your DWG ticket. Nice work on the edits so far. We'll get your limit raised. One comment for this change is to use the natural=woods for this sort of 'forest'. In OSM parlance, a forest is a managed stand for timber or something like that. |
|
| 150646132 | thanks for the fix Aleksa. This edit you fixed was the result of vandalism to the map by Pokemon Go editors. Please be on the lookout for these edits as you work to fix coastlines. They are adding `natural=coastline` in places where there are not any coastline and adding beaches. Please see this thread for more info: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413 In this case the water had the pond tag before. Can you look back at the history and restore? Otherwise feel free to write us data@osmfoundation.org Elliott Plack
|
|
| 151265136 | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 151211757, 151214716, 151235269, 151243280. |
|
| 151243280 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/151265136 where the changeset comment is: Ticket#2024051310000288 |
|
| 151211757 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/151265136 where the changeset comment is: Ticket#2024051310000288 |
|
| 151214716 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/151265136 where the changeset comment is: Ticket#2024051310000288 |
|
| 151235269 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/151265136 where the changeset comment is: Ticket#2024051310000288 |
|
| 150791381 | Block issued. Please respond here or via the ticket number listed. osm.org/user_blocks/16033 |
|
| 150861872 | Resolved via changeset/150861776 |