ElliottPlack's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 137306148 | Also, Rick, it'd be super helpful if you have any firsthand experience in the area if you could say whether or not this road is open: way/43056865 According to Waze it has been deconstructed but it looks like it is there on imagery. |
|
| 137306148 | To confirm, the bridge that no longer exists is still closed, but drivers can now enter NB I-95 from Milnor Street and exit SB up to Exit 30. Please confirm, thanks. |
|
| 137067314 | Hi there, Elliott with the Data Work Group here. Arch is right about the tag for abandoned trails but it AllTrails is also rolling out new tools to help users better understand what is private property based on tagging. It also appears there is a bit of an edit war with some suss reverts in recent days around this trail. Are we all clear on what it is/isn't? Thanks,
|
|
| 137076588 | Hi there, why was this attempted to be reverted? |
|
| 137028168 | Hi there, OSM production is not for testing. You can experiment with the API here: osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing |
|
| 137097696 | I've asked Nathperot to respond via osm.org/user_blocks/7206 J’ai demandé à l’utilisateur de répondre à ces commentaires en ajoutant un bloc zéro heure. |
|
| 137097732 | I've asked Nathperot to respond via osm.org/user_blocks/7206 J’ai demandé à l’utilisateur de répondre à ces commentaires en ajoutant un bloc zéro heure. |
|
| 137098328 | I've asked Nathperot to respond via osm.org/user_blocks/7206 J’ai demandé à l’utilisateur de répondre à ces commentaires en ajoutant un bloc zéro heure. |
|
| 137220872 | Thanks for doing that path! |
|
| 137213706 | here here! |
|
| 54852093 | In light of today's events, could you take a look at this interchange? According to PennDOT, some of these ramps are not only closed but removed altogether. Need some fresh eyes to review the closures. Thanks! |
|
| 137148278 | Heh, I think the data in SC may have been stale by the time you’d added this. I updated it to opposite_lane for that contraflow lane heading north. See ya around sotmus |
|
| 128852653 | hi there. good looking mapping here. What is a bench=perch? |
|
| 136394996 | Hi there, thanks for adding this. There is some new Mapillary here from 5/27 if you'd like to look and make some revisions to the fixmes. Ciao! |
|
| 135575143 | Hi there, that's great! I know MORE and appreciate their work. And, I especially appreciate your work in the arena of mapping paths. Please keep it up. It is a passion of mine as well. I've done a project with the staff and Friends of Patapsco Valley State Park to map all authoritative trails there in precise detail and have done similar project at the various reservoir watersheds. I hike and trail run, but not really MTB--something I'd love to try. If you don't know the surface, totally fine to leave blank. I will often put in the type of 'unpaved' as a placeholder when I know its not a paved path, but not much else. On the topic of surface, OSM has weird surface types that don't always line up to American English. Some trail ones to watch for: - gravel: only used on trails and tracks that have golf ball-sized gravel. Examples would be BGE access roads where they dump gravel in as the bed.
If you find new trails, I'd love to know about them! I do a fair bit of exploratory OSM hiking/running, so if you'd like to, we could exchange contact infos or send them via OSM messaging. Don't worry about the boundaries too, I fixed the ones I noticed. Also, one other tip: the OSM standards for tagging route color are tricky. The way to do this is by setting up a route relation and then putting that information on the route. There's instructions on the wiki but it is an advanced process that may require other software. If you find some of them, let me know and I'll help you. You can also see all the trails with routes using this waymarked trails tool https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13.0/39.2426/-76.7486 The example above is PVSP. Happy trails, please feel free to ask any questions. Elliott |
|
| 135575143 | ||
| 135575143 | Example changeset comment. I corrected the boundary here so you don't need to worry about that. Just keep it in mind in the future. |
|
| 135575143 | Hello there and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for adding the new Solstice Valley Trail at the Waterworks Park! A few tips to get you started on your mapping quests: 1. Type a little bit more about your edits when you write changeset comments. "adding path" doesn't say much. Instead try to tell what you mapped, why, and how. Here's a guide: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#How_should_I_write_Changeset_Comments No two comments should really be the same. 2. Avoid crossing the boundaries of a boundary when crossing them. For instance, in this edit you'd snapped the new path to the park boundary. That path can cross it without touching. 3. Please add trail surfaces! If you were there, you could survey the surface type, e.g., dirt or ground. That is helpful for path mapping. Otherwise, keep up the good work. --
|
|
| 130524633 | all set: changeset/135540344 |
|
| 130524633 | FYI way/763624993 not a residential road. It is a gated driveway. |