ElliottPlack's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 116374863 | Go Steve!! Solid work here. |
|
| 116057383 | Hi there, Elliott with OSMF DWG. I hope I can help resolve the issue here but first I am a native English speaker only. Can you both communicate in English? If not, I can find a Swedish speaking DWG member. |
|
| 114831535 | ||
| 114831535 | Thanks for contacting the DWG. I am familiar with this data source and the local area. Taking a look at things I agree that this appears to be an import of the Montgomery County dataset. I've actually working on a proposal for a more wholesale import of the MoCo data but would have conflated addresses and excluded existing features. Therefore I would agree that rolling this back may be the best option. @jpeterson, please respond here to the comments. We all appreciate efforts to update the map but when using external data, there are some important considerations to make with the formal import process. -- Elliott
|
|
| 115730763 | also wanted to mention I fixed a lot of the geometries of the roads in Homeland. |
|
| 114931480 | Hi there. What was "wrong" with these classifications? |
|
| 115137049 | Looks like a solid changeset in my personal opinion. Keep up the good work! From a DWG perspective, we are interested in this effort and will follow this changeset discussion.
|
|
| 114588717 | Hi there, please do not modify existing water features this way. This should be set up as a multipolygon, not as a polygon with a random hole. --
|
|
| 114789277 | Hi there again. This is not how to draw a country club. The club boundary should follow the legal boundary of the property, where edges of the homes are, not all the way around the neighborhood. Can you fix this? Take a look at where the edges of the course are if you are unsure where the boundary is. |
|
| 114627613 | Hi there, Why add golf tags to these water bodies that aren't near a golf course? Why add buildings where there are none. It is fine to add waterways and building where they exist, but not where they aren't. Adding fake features is considered vandalism, which could result in a full scale roll back of your work. Do you understand? - Elliott Plack
|
|
| 115080033 | Hi there, this lake is not a lateral water hazard, it's just a lake. Why would you edit it this way? This is considered vandalism by the community. Will you roll these changes back? - Elliott Plack
|
|
| 115080149 | - Elliott Plack
|
|
| 115080149 | Hi there, please don't make edits like this without describing the purpose of the changeset. This adds a fairway where there isn't a golf course underneath. Why? Have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments and |
|
| 114758620 | Designer, In this version you deleted some roadways for no apparent reason other than the comment "virginian" on your changeset. Why did you do this? This change will be reverted as it is damaging to the map. --
|
|
| 115057655 | This is the wrong way to draw a rough area, it should be set with the fairway as a multipolygon ring. Please review leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
|
|
| 114483846 | Hi there, this sort of golf course editing where you are replacing multipolygons with regular sand areas that merge is damaging the map. Please refrain from doing so and clean up the mess here by rolling this back. Further edits of this nature will result and a roll back of all these edits. Please review leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for tips. --
|
|
| 114983592 | Boopington, if you're going to be dualizing roads, please review the Mapbox Intersection Modeling guide. These examples are vetted by the community and routing data users. Take a look at the W Lincoln Trail Blvd and redo that intersection based on this. https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/
|
|
| 114799558 | Ticket#2021121310000109 |
|
| 114799558 | Thanks!
|
|
| 114372442 | Dave, this edit damages existing roads by converting them to cart paths. Please refrain from this sort of thing. --
|