Hello beatnickgr,

Do you know what's on the upper floors of this buildings? I doubt that this restaurant occupies all floors.

Best regard,
Dimitar

They were mapped as a single object. I've mapped them individually yesterday (changeset/135275314).

Hello Reaktor,

Thanks for adding the new railway track. Can you please verify that the line goes around Dragoman? Quote from ОВОС №5-5/2016 г. (https://www.moew.government.bg/static/media/ups/tiny/PD/OVOS_5-5-2016.pdf):

За участък „Петърч - Драгоман“ по алтернатива A (вариант A и C, 2015 г.) с изграждане на нова гара Сливница върху съоръжения и запазване на трасето преминаващо през град Драгоман, без вариант D за скоростен байпас на град Драгоман

Is there a newer ОВОС? If there is, can you send a link to it?

Best regards,
Dimitar

Hi rhhs,

Do you know if the covering of these tennis courts has been temporary? I can't see any roofs on the latest imagery.

Best wishes,
Dimitar

Hello kkarawichew,

And welcome to OpenStreetMap. When you make your next edits, please make sure to use other imagery that is not Bing. Bing has very low quality and everything has a lot of offset. To change the imagery, press B on your keyboard and choose a more up to date imagery (like Esri World Imagery or Maxar).

If possible, take a look at the area around SMG (way/239404427). Chumerna street should be straight and the school's building is not a few meters from the buildings on the other side. The entrance to the backyard of the school is also not at such angle.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.

Best wishes,
Dimitar

Hello Carto_Ferret,

What is your source for updating these buildings?

Regards,
Dimitar

(the comment was meant for changeset/135094920 but I didn't check where I was sending it)

Hello ikonact,

It looks like you've deleted the islets that you've added yesterday. I assume that you've deleted them by accident?

Best wishes,
Dimitar

Здравей Reaktor,

За в бъдеще, може ли да слагаш check_date:smoothness със датата на която е подадена информацията за състоянието на пътя?

Поздрави,
Митко

Здравей Пенка,

Изглежда че в близост до този път има някаква сграда. Имаш ли представа дали е бензиностанция, автосервиз или нещо друго?

Поздрави,
Митко

Hello Alexey,

Thanks for adding the street name! If possible, try to put the English name in name:en and the Bulgarian name in the name tag. You can also check the guide for street names in Bulgaria (osm.wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#Имена_на_улици_и_булеварди).

Best wishes,
Dimitar

You are welcome!

Благодарности за бързото обновяване на всичките пътища, които са били отворени днес! Добавих един таг за път без изход на края на старото трасе, защото някой може да се подлъже от старите сателитни снимки и да реши да го свърже с новото трасе.

Поздрави,
Митко

Здравей Иван,

За в бъдеще, може ли да слагаш check_date:smoothness със датата на която е подадена информацията за състоянието на пътя?

Поздрави,
Митко

Hello Termininja,

Can I ask you from where you got the streams information? I couldn't locate way/1157924807 on Bing or any other imagery. It also looks like that stream goes through the middle of some buildings.

Best wishes,
Dimitar

Hello davidmguest,

You've added a ref to tag to way/26491803 which is quite far compared to the edits that you've made in this changeset. Was that by mistake?

Best wishes.
Dimitar

Hello M Ton, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for mapping the addresses so fast! It looks like we were mapping them at the same time which caused some duplicates. I've merged them so everything is fine now. If you need any help or if you have any questions about OpenStreetMap, feel free to ask me.

Best wishes,
Dimitar

@blankmash The problem is not related to raised crossings. Some apps (namely StreetComplete) ask users about kerb heights on crossings. When the crossing is mapped only as a node on a road, it adds kerb=* to that node. This is the approved way to tag kerbs on such crossings (osm.wiki/Tag:barrier:kerb#Alternative_on_crossings).

The problem is that iD's validator suggests to add barrier=kerb to these nodes which makes routers think that there is a kerb in the middle of the road (which is not the case). The bug is currently being tracked (osm.wiki/Tag:barrier:kerb#Alternative_on_crossings), hopefully it will get fixed soon. Until then, please ignore that warning.

Hi Martin,

I agree that the whole road should be upgraded to primary after the section from Gotse Delchev to Paradise Center is built, but it's too early to upgrade the currently built sections to secondary.

I also agree that secondary is fine, but only after the section towards G. M. Dimitrov is done. Until then, Filip Kutev ends in tertiary streets on both ends. If we want the classification to be correct we should upgrade Emiliyan Stanev, Srebarna and Mogilata to secondary. I assume that you know what's the condition of the last two.

The classification is used to denote the current importance of a road. I'm not sure how currently ongoing construction works increase it's importance for the general public. It will increase it, but only after the construction is done.

Best regards,
Dimitar

You haven't added the barrier tags indeed, I'm just pointing out that the problem is caused by iD's validator (see versions 5 and 6 of node/3063961715/history).

StreetComplete is asking about it because the two kerbs are in the "middle" of the path. If they were at the end of a crossing way (higway=footway + footway=crossing), StreetComplete won't ask you about the kerb height.