Hi
Good to see it open again. The original tags for the pub are on its boundary way. I've reverted those.

Hi
Just to let you know there's a grown feeling that the public_transport schema should be rescinded as it only duplicates existing tags. highway=bus_stop in these instances. You may wish to spend your OSM time on something which adds unique improvements.

building=static_caravan
building=static_caravan

You have a responsibility to map to agreed guidelines. Please read about multipolyogons Note the simple example is just a way.:
osm.wiki/Multipolygon_Examples#Forest_.28One_closed_way.29

Also grassland is for areas of rough grass, not maintained, cut grass.
natural=grassland

Mapping relations with only one member is a complete waste of time & should not be done.

Both the barrier & natural tags can be added to the way & will still render.

Stop positions aren't railway stations

You've now created 4 railway stations at Cardiff Central

Clearly not a building!

The church closed in 2015

Hi
What is this "dependent service"?
As it doesn't have a roundabout tag it sounds like the fault is in this service & needs to be fixed there.

But contributors are removing this tag without comprehension.

Not to be taken as gospel, but this OS map indicates paths. https://os.openstreetmap.org/#zoom=17&lat=51.49540&lon=-2.55259
Maybe worth a second look?

The P1 preset using foot=yes was to indicate official pedestrian access (PROW, Bridleway etc).
This is why double checking & possible upgrading to 'designated' is required.

Removing foot=yes without understanding why, will reduce the quality of the OSM database. .

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
To check - if there's a path under the bridge it would be best to do a survey & extend it so it joins other paths.

@ spiregrain Thanks for clarifying

@SomeoneElse. Osmose have imported JOSM's validator which also incorrectly claims: "Suspicious tag combination highway=cycleway together with foot=designated, use highway=path"
I queried it here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-July/046472.html

foot=yes/designated is a valid tag in OSM.
It can be used to distinguish the difference between an asphalt path through a housing estate & a route of worn grass around a field where the owner tolerate dog walkers.

I believe it was originally used as an indicator that it was a PROW. Tagging has progressed to be more specific, but foot=yes is a good indicator that rarely edited paths might need updating to PROWS

Out of curiosity, why are your amendments apparently random across the country?

Ah, apologies. I didn't load the relations. As you were.

To check Tom, why are you splitting ways, but making no tag amendments?

To check:
Where did you obtain the outline for the Wash? Why have you excluded the sandbanks? It doesn't look that accurate.
I may have missed it, but I thought the last discussion decided oceans/seas/area of open water to be named with a node.

I've started remapping manually on the user's other changesets (primarily railway stations). I haven't reverted as:
a) Others have added changesets after.
b) The user has added other data which /may/ be valid.
This one seems fully incorrect & 'clean' so should be reverted I believe.