Thanks for correcting my typo.

Hi
There is already a railway station tag.
way/860241027#map=19/51.924333/-2.067219

Why doesn't it have as ref?

All tags is 'tagging for the renderer'. Otherwise it would be just black dots & lines.
The correct expression is 'tagging *incorrectly* for the renderer'

These edits improve the quality of the OSM database.

What is this?
relation/19285267#map=17/51.477741/-2.620587

Don't add addr:unit=unknown. Use fixme instead.

Please ensure you tag correctly.
way/683218820#map=19/51.300344/-0.615254

I've 'reopened' Banana Bridge.
https://x.com/BristolCouncil/status/1936049587170529681
If you've been past recently you may wish to add you're own updates.

Hi
Could you clarify why you split this way please?
way/1395713260

This station is not on the Elizabeth line.
node/34037748

Convenience - Adding residential areas, which have a non-residential inner area, to one MP relation is easier than creating separate MPs.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25a1

I see no problem with splitting them down into individual closed way polygons, as long as they don't have any inners.

You can't have a tunnel & a bridge Redacting.

Is the second platform & line operational?

What, within maproulette, is telling you that Euston Station's network is Network Rail?

Thanks for spotting that & letting me know. I misinterpreted another wiki page. Should be fixed now.

These are two separate stations with different owners/operators.

Hi
if you do any more could you reuse the existing linear platform. Retaining the history of objects is often useful for validation/QA purposes.

Station No. 4 error:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3663368460

A third example of mistagging a railway station.
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/4451063672

Another example of mistagging a railway station.
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/273210309