Hi
You're not sounding rude.

You've changed multiple items from tags that represent farms to tags that do not represent farms, purely to, by your own admission, "get the farm’s name on the map rendering". This absolutely is 'tagging for the renderer'.

Although landuse=farm isn't fully accurate, it's better than place=farm which is not a farm.
To remove landuse=farm from the database (which is the intention of these edits) it would be more accurate to replace nodes with this tag to landuse=farmyard, which is what the vast majority of these are, even though they're nodes not polygons.

Hi
"to get at least the farm’s name on the map rendering," < This is tagging for the render & is to be discouraged. Mapnik carto is just one of many renderings.

By changing from landuse=farm to place=farm you made the OSM database more inaccurate - you made a tag which represents a farm to something which isn't a farm.

If you "have no means to decide whether it’s still a real farmyard" then you should not have made the amendments en bloc.

Is there a wiki page explaining the 'NoFarm' clear up?

Note the description for place=farm: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Farm&oldid=1459338

This is the rare (non existent in the UK?) where a place such as a village or hamlet of residential houses unrelated to the farm has taken the name of the farm. Ithink you should have tagged it (& others?) as landuse=farmyard

Hi
node/4557760230/history#map=18/50.64972/-2.04102

Could you explain why you made this amendment? It looks like a farmyard to me.

Hi Zanzer321
There's no need ot keep adding a node for Percy Boys. The data already exists as a polygon accurately positioned at the club's location.

Is it steps only to the North bank? Seems strange as it was meant to be a shared path.

Hi
Why did you delete this way? It was clearly mis-tagged by me (using Potlatch's 'replicate' key, I think). It should residential, as evident by looking at aerial imagery.
Error like this should be corrected not deleted.

Hi osmometer Welcome to OSM. Nice work in Batheaston

I've renamed the road to Mill Lane as there's a specific bridge:name. I used: http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/map_browser?bbox=377174.384844,166833.368828,377644.461562,167121.759453&layers=os_locator&base_style=white,aa_2&clear_map_history=true&referrer=area

I think I name Brow Hill incorrectly, but I've never found a 'Northend' road sign.

Tip: In iD editor you can easily square up a building by right-clicking on it & selecting 'Square'

I've checked BANES's latest Definitive Map data & it's not in there.

Hi
Is this definitely a designated public footpath?: way/492444175#map=17/51.41655/-2.41284

I saw no signs the last time I walked it.

Cheers
DaveF

Please don't create *multi* polygons with only one member.

Oops... I meant field further to the East.

Hi
node/754098632 Is this a new gate or are you confusing it with the one in to the fiels further West?

Hi Leigh
FYI Pubs, with their associated tags, are often already mapped with a polygon encompassing the whole of the property including car parks, gardens etc as in this case: way/201405528 I tag any buildings as 'building=pub'

Yes, it's just opened: http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/brand-new-tapas-and-sherry-bar-pintxo-de-bath-brings-the-taste-of-spain-to-barton-street/story-30303404-detail/story.html

I think the wiki page needs expanding. Similar to schools, Universities & hospitals, a boundary around all elements owned by the pub seems the more detailed/accurate way to map.

I've posted to the tagging forum: "Mapping pubs as full areas"
Mapping pubs as full areas

What should be mapped is the footprint of the building at ground level. But you mapped the edge of the roof. Due to the angle the photo was taken (note you can see the right hand face of the buildings) the left hand roof edge is shown too far over. I'll explain clearer when we meet next.

In JOSM there's a way to revert certain entities using the revert plugin:

File > Open Location. Paste in the changeset URL. Download

Select the ways/nodes that need reverting.

Data > Revert changeset > Revert Selection Only.

Leigh
I'm afraid you're a victim of the parallax error.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax

The buildings of Margaret's Buildings in iD are shown 'leaning over'. For the buildings you've amended note how they were set out to ground level to their right , but you stretched their left sides to the 'overhanging' roofs.

The best way to map in this situation is to map the extent of the roof then move it so it aligns with the building at ground level.

Could you revet them please.

@azzap I haven't changed it, but you may want to have a read of the second paragraph of this: amenity=biergarten