Hi What were you attempt to achieve with this changeset?
This was removed:
way/600468563

Same Q as before.

Hi
What landuse is it? Yes isn't detailed enough.

What are these?
way/650647038

If there's no vehicle access, it's not a service road anymore.

Hi
Don't delete valid data.
node/6606087122

Hi Pretty sure they're not based on the platform. Where's the accurate position for them?

Hi
Tourist railway stations are not public_transport. Please don't click iD editor's validation/resolve button without comprehending the circumstances.

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-2.33890&lat=51.37624&zoom=9

Hi could you take another look at your multipolygon relation. It's far too complicated

.
relation/10409324

osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Again, please don't change foot=designated to foot=yes on PROW footpaths. It reduces the quality of the OSM database.

way/168554853
This too large for a pitch (bordered with white lines). Please don't assume iD editor is factually correct.

Please don't change foot=designated to foot=yes. It reduces the quality of the OSM database.

Thanks for spotting that & letting me know.
Now deleted.

Please don't remove area tags from railway=platform mapped as polygons. They're a required tag.

Hi Neil
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/4002666
Could you clarify the name of the tunnel structure?
Even if it has a name, the road's name should still be Hotwells.

I've fixed a few in the area, but may take a while to rerender

Hi
All railway stations are mapped. Please don't duplicate them in train station buildings

Thanks for spotting that & letting me know.
I'll do a UK search for similar.

Hi
relation/10901513#map=10/55.2823/-4.3835
Where did you obtain the data for this relation? It covers a large area overlaying many residential, wood, & water area which clearly aren't 'heath'