It appears you are unaware of P2's 'task' facility. Why is that?

Do automated mechanical edits involve deletions mixed in with tag edits?

Do you look at the time a changeset is active before making unfounded accusations?

It's a "large area" because it's the "longest river in the United Kingdom". Why do I have to explain that to you? You should be intelligent enough to work it out for yourself.

Why haven't you read the wiki fully?

What evidence makes you think it was "mechanical"?

Hi Joe
This has already been created as a polygon:
way/55466905

Hello RobotChao

Has this bridge been constructed?

Hi RobotChao
To check, is there definitely a new building here? It appears a very strange place to put it.

Are you sure?

Yes, i saw what was edited before you, but he tagged it as Bristol Waste Company & if you google it: http://www.bristolwastecompany.co.uk/

It appears it's recycling, nut unsure if it's for the public to drop stuff off.

Note they use OSM in their small map.

Hi
Brunswick Place is the name of the southern terrace of houses & so is not an alternative road name. (Montpelier is the name of the row opposite) This happens a lot in Bath.
Julian Road is the road's name throughout.

Is this recycling centre open to the public or just for the authority to sort household waste?
would it benefit from a 'recycling_type=centre' tag?

Fixed.
Thanks for letting me know.

Hi Tim

I'm struggling to be convinced Mangotsfield is a village: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mangotsfield

The tags location is taken from: http://os.openstreetmap.org/#zoom=17&lat=51.48596&lon=-2.49834

Hi
Welcome to OSM

You can trim your GPX file so all routes don't lead to you front door. I use Garmin's Basecamp as I have a Garmin unit, but there's a few others, often free:
osm.wiki/Edit_GPS_tracks

FYI I asked for the opinion of others on this forum thread:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-July/076379.html

highway=crossing & crossing=no combination is, as we all appear to agree, contradictory. And I agree with you that highway=crossing on its own is superfluous.

However, by removing it, you're assuming that it's an uncontrolled crossing. It could be light controlled but the person adding it failed to add the extra data. Without that knowledge the tags should not have been removed.

You've left crossing=no as a single tag. You have no knowledge that crossing a road at these points is impossible. Your edit has reduced the quality of the database & which I believe should be revert.

Once that's done I will ask GB users to look at those edits in their area to see if the crossing=no tag is relevant.

P.S. 'Trolltags' is a poor misnomer.

Hi
Why have you assumed there isn't a crossing? crossing=no could be the incorrect tag. Looking at some of your edits you've taken what looks like legitimate crossing places & removed them.

Hmm.. "almost 6 years ago" so I can't remember off the cuff although they have been upgrading some stiles in the area. I'll put it on my list of things to check out

*doesn't add...