OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

CycleStreets's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by CycleStreets

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
4276301 CycleStreets

Crossing here seems incomplete with wrong geometry. Also, the cycleway geometry goes around it.

4276296 CycleStreets

Does the segregated cycleway really go up here? The aerial imagery seems to show the crossing being used.

4276297 CycleStreets

Aerial imagery shows lane on road here, in addition to the track going through the crossing.

4276300 CycleStreets

Cycleway crossing doesn't match what appears to be recent aerial imagery.

4276298 CycleStreets

Missing join from cycleway to road here?

4276324 CycleStreets

Side road appears to lose cycle segregation, according to the aerial imagery.

4554427 CycleStreets

This and other crossings are marked merely as footways rather than crossings.

4537868 CycleStreets

Cambridge Independent reports this week of upgraded link for cyclists and walkers, including resurfacing, new bike parking, and lighting. Not sure exact location.

4496507 CycleStreets

We understand that there is cycle parking missing at St John ambulance outside Cranmore Place off Cranmore Drive Solihull.

4308378 CycleStreets

way/1292824574 should be removed because the cycleway along Huntingdon Road is more correctly modelled by the cycleway=track or cycleway=lane properites of the highway=primary. Cyclists riding on the cycleway on Huntingdon Road do not have to give way when passing side roads, which is one of the main reasons why the cycleway is part of the road, not a separate way.